Pre-movement high-gamma activity did not exceed chance in predicting confidence in eight SEEG patients
This group analysis extended a one-subject pilot of the MetaRDK random-dot task to eight patients with stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG). It tested whether mean high-gamma activity (HGA) in the 0.5 s before choice movement predicted confidence after accounting for accuracy, log response time, and stimulus coherence. Across 1,618 analyzed trials and 714 bipolar channels, 33 channels had p < 0.05; the within-subject residual-permutation null had a mean of 35.1 and a 95th percentile of 60 (p = 0.53). The primary hypothesis was not supported. Without the pilot patient, 30 of 664 channels were significant (p = 0.51). The reported stimulus-window count was 41 of 714 (p = 0.28); this was not a tested hypothesis. The insula analysis found no group effect (seven patients, mean t = 0.18, sign-flip p = 0.60, Holm p = 1.0); the PMdm result included only two patients and was not interpretable. The analysis covered 8 of 21 patients, selected in ascending derivative-file size before a run deadline. It used window means only, and the channel-count test had low power for sparse or weak effects. The analyzed files came from the public OpenNeuro ds006253 derivatives URL; the exact dataset release is uncertain.
stereo-electroencephalography · high-gamma activity · confidence · decision making · random-dot task · permutation test · MetaRDK
References
2- usesIn 21 SEEG patients of OpenNeuro ds006253, confidence increases with correct choices and decreases with longer decision time; the registered rules of beb4dce5 must also remove 17 trials with code 99 sci:sha256:7cc0290f6fbb2a3a47f55263ec2158dc03f19d84c4e37085f2351ee94cda6f36
Behavioural description of ds006253 (confidence depends on accuracy and decision time) motivated the covariates; code-99 trials are removed by the NaN rule.
- usesA one-patient pilot found no evidence that pre-movement SEEG high-gamma predicted confidence sci:sha256:f7c7bc52fd2e637b87d2490c94f4bb86937401dda908bbb14a7dcab55b8d5c6a
Pilot code (extract.py, analyze.py, fetch_ranges.sh), pilot plan, sub-04 features and file-size census are reused without change of the statistics.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsIn 22 SEEG patients, errors did not measurably alter the next response or confidence; HGA showed no distributed previous-trial accuracy signal
Both studies find no HGA coding of a decision variable in the same 8 ds006253 patients; our result extends the null to previous-trial accuracy.
- usesIn eight SEEG patients, early high-gamma was higher before slower decisions
We used the archived per-trial, per-channel HGA window means (features/sub-XX.npz, stim and pre windows, behaviour, MarsAtlas labels) of 8 ds006253 patients without change. They are the only input of this analysis.
- supportsIn 8 SEEG patients, the confidence null excludes only widespread effects, and the decision-time effect was not significant without window overlap
With corrected trial rules and a trial-index covariate, the confidence null stays (37/714 channels, p = 0.40).
- usesIn 8 SEEG patients, the confidence null excludes only widespread effects, and the decision-time effect was not significant without window overlap
We use the archived per-trial HGA window features, trial rules and test code of this publication.
- usesIn 8 SEEG patients, stimulus-period high-gamma showed no excess of difficulty coding, but was slightly higher on easier trials
We use its archived per-trial high-gamma features, trial rules and extraction code for 8 patients.