sciscape Publications
← All publications

Four TESS visits of 55 Cancri e do not require a change in mean eclipse depth with a fixed circular orbit

We tested whether the mean optical eclipse depth of 55 Cancri e changes between TESS sectors 21, 44, 46, and 72. We fit 113 events from four public 120 second SPOC light curves. Each event has a local quadratic baseline and a fixed eclipse shape for a circular orbit. Negative depths are allowed. We estimate visit errors by resampling event records in circular blocks. With blocks of four events, the visit depths are 14.80 ± 5.46, 2.84 ± 5.12, 11.23 ± 3.79, and 7.38 ± 5.64 parts per million (ppm). A centered bootstrap test for equal visit means gives Q = 2.987 and p = 0.405. For block lengths 1, 2, 4, and 8, p ranges from 0.216 to 0.583. No tested eclipse fit choice and block length rejects equality at the nominal 0.05 level. The pooled depth depends on the baseline: it is 9.37 ± 2.39 ppm for a ±0.18 day quadratic window and 4.02 ± 2.93 ppm for a ±0.12 day window. The same 113 events enter both fits. A later paired comparison gives a wide-minus-short difference of 4.25 ± 2.02 ppm when the main visit weights are held fixed. This independent analysis agrees with prior four-sector work and adds a reproducible event dataset and method sensitivity tests. It does not establish constant brightness or identify a physical cause. The block errors assume representative within-visit noise and have limited calibration with 23–32 events per visit. The package contains raw FITS inputs, source URLs and hashes, the event inclusion table, all fit variants, code, figures, and run instructions.

55 Cancri e · TESS · secondary eclipses · optical photometry · event resampling · baseline sensitivity · reproducible research

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

11
  1. usesdoi:10.17909/T9-NMC8-F686

    The four frozen two minute SPOC light curves are from this TESS data collection. Exact products and hashes are preserved.

  2. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243768

    We use the period and transit epoch, approximate eclipse geometry, and stated time cuts as one comparison. Our event estimator and noise test differ.

  3. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2609.26874

    This September 2026 preprint already analyzes the same four TESS sectors. Our independent visit depths agree, and our package adds event-level results and baseline and block sensitivity tests.

  4. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abbc0f

    Prior TESS sector 21 optical eclipse measurement.

  5. doi:10.54254/2753-8818/2026.HZ28325

    Prior study of 2020, 2021, and 2023 data. Its methods identify the 2023 visit as sector 72.

  6. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833154

    Reference solution for the fixed orbital radius to stellar radius ratio of 3.52, obtained through the NASA Exoplanet Archive.

  7. usesdoi:10.1117/12.2233418

    SPOC processing produced the light curves used here.

  8. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11012.x

    Prior account of time-correlated photometric noise and transit significance.

  9. usesdoi:10.1214/aos/1176347265

    Background for block resampling. Our circular event block rule and small sample limitations are stated explicitly.

  10. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244894

    Context for optical eclipse measurements with CHEOPS.

  11. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450748

    Context for infrared variability reported with JWST. No JWST data are analyzed here.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.