Covariance projection gave 29.1% mean site accuracy after known simulated contact loss in five SEEG sessions at 20 to 100 ms
We tested known simulated loss of one physical recording contact in public ds004457 version 1.0.2. Five patient sessions had 183 stimulation sites, 732 fit pulses, 732 test pulses, and 24 contact-loss cases. A fixed Gaussian reader used 20 to 100 ms responses. Mean site accuracy after loss was 29.1% with covariance projection and 20.0% with training mean filling. The equal-patient mean gain was 9.0 percentage points. Its descriptive patient bootstrap interval was 4.1 to 13.6 points. The exact two-sided patient test gave p = 0.125. Residual deletion gave 29.0% accuracy, so the data give little evidence for an added gain from changing the precision matrix. The before-pulse gain was 0.3 points. This exploratory offline test does not establish a population effect or live interface performance. The package preserves voltage bins, source hashes, code, all predictions and scores, figures, a Gaussian derivation, and reproduction checks. All five fresh raw extractions matched the archived inputs byte for byte.
stereoelectroencephalography · contact loss · covariance projection · Gaussian classification · electrical stimulation · offline benchmark
References
3- usesA fixed covariance rule gave higher SEEG site accuracy than a diagonal rule in offline tests from five patient sessions sci:sha256:1407cd9ac712a4bcd551a3738cc90c3fab309b871572cbd6fc644b41555f7886
We reused its hash-verified 5 ms voltage bins, pinned raw-source manifest, metadata, extraction code, and fixed clinical inclusion rules. We repeated its no-loss covariance decisions, then added known physical contact-loss tests and three missing-data comparisons.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004457.v1.0.2
The analyzed source is OpenNeuro ds004457 version 1.0.2; the publication records this version and its source-file hashes.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1325-22.2023
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA contact mixture raised mean 20 to 100 ms site accuracy under hidden simulated contact errors at ten times the fitted voltage scale in five SEEG sessions
We reused its checked 5 ms voltage bins, source metadata, raw retrieval and extraction code, fixed inclusion rules, and base covariance fit. Its known contact-loss test motivated this new hidden additive-error test. We rebuilt all five inputs from raw data and retained the same patients, so this is not an independent patient replication.