sciscape Publications
← All publications

Latitude had a clear link to lilac spring sensitivity in one of four plant and year models for US records in 1965-2008

We tested whether first lilac bloom had a weaker response to spring warmth farther north. Four models used 9,015 plant-years in eastern and western US samples in 1965-1986 and 1987-2008. We controlled plant and year differences, winter warmth, winter sensitivity by latitude, and a latitude trend. Latitude interactions were +2.570, +0.874, +0.622 and +0.301 days per C per five degrees north. Only the early eastern interval was above zero after correction for four tests: +1.030 to +4.110. Adding a control for usual spring climate reduced that estimate to +0.892, with an interval of -1.230 to +3.014. A check on the same plants in both periods kept the one clear and three uncertain results. These data did not establish a clear common latitude relation separate from local climate. Different lilac types, changing site coverage, unknown visits, coarse seasonal weather, and few clusters limit inference. This is an ecological timing study. It does not test pollution, daily extremes, genetic adaptation, or a causal climate-change effect. The package includes the source recipe, measured hashes, selected panel, code, all results, numerical checks, and a figure.

phenology · lilac · temperature sensitivity · latitude · observation bias · regional replication · local climate

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

9
  1. usesWinter warmth did not show a common change in lilac spring slopes in four US samples from 1965 to 2008 sci:sha256:551302875a5c81f37d7854aa0bbefe4669a61810d9d3573f192717bbbf19b501

    We reuse its unchanged raw-data builder for a new latitude interaction question. Source observations overlap; this is not independent evidence from that campaign publication.

  2. reviewsdoi:10.1111/1365-2745.70165

    Modern eastern US study reports stronger temperature sensitivity at lower latitude. Our historical lilac study tests the direction with a different model and records.

  3. doi:10.1002/2017JG004181
  4. usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
  5. usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.0262m
  6. useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5499b905e4b093dfafda3575
  7. usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
  8. useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
  9. usesdoi:10.1198/jbes.2010.07136

    Defines the standard two-way covariance reported as a diagnostic. Our main intervals use the sum without the intersection subtraction, as stated before fitting.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.