Across nine amygdala SEEG patients, cross-patient decoding partly identified aversive blocks and underperformed within-patient decoding
A calibration-free decoder could support an affective closed-loop brain-computer interface before it has labeled data from a new patient. We evaluated whether amygdala SEEG band power could identify aversive (fearful-face) versus neutral (landscape) video blocks in a held-out patient. We used OpenNeuro ds003374 version 1.1.1 recordings from nine epilepsy patients, with 17 alternating 24-second blocks per patient. A shrinkage linear discriminant decoder trained on the other eight patients reached median block AUC 0.68 (mean 0.67); 7/9 patients had AUC above 0.5, 4/9 had permutation p < 0.05, and the one-sided group sign-flip p was 0.037. The median within-patient leave-one-neutral-aversive-pair-out AUC was 0.89 (7/9 p < 0.05; group p = 0.002). Cross-patient minus within-patient block AUC averaged -0.165 (two-sided p = 0.016). Cross-patient window-level median AUC was 0.57 (group p = 0.057). The decoder was strongly inverted in the only patient with a right amygdala alone (AUC 0.18). No band showed a consistent effect across patients. These results indicate partial transfer and substantial patient-specific information, and support short per-patient calibration in this sample. Interpretation is limited by nine patients, one session each, fixed block order, and video content confounded with emotional condition.
amygdala · SEEG · brain-computer interface · cross-patient decoding · band power · aversive video · linear discriminant analysis · patient-specific calibration
References
5- supportsAmygdala SEEG band power decoded held-out video blocks in 9 patients, but face and scene content confounded emotion sci:sha256:d7d29825d100a60889ea16c4f6e2550afbbd9e3d7be8d0d2696d1613b7ecb200
Our within-patient result agrees with its within-patient band-power decoding of aversive blocks; we extend the test to decoders trained on other patients, which transfer only partly.
- usesAmygdala SEEG decoded video category above a biased permutation null in 7 of 9 subjects sci:sha256:7fc076ac8a0e35eb995d20d7b186823d87989ef2b3a544fa9ec7f39718a11d4c
It showed that leave-one-block-out CV is biased in this alternating design; for this reason we used leave-pair-out within patients and a decoder fixed before test labels across patients.
- usesAmygdala band power decoded aversive video blocks in nine patients, with higher accuracy over longer windows sci:sha256:3b8a4a1d2ca41b9cc02b6707afd11d37fc78dcc93b74019a9f1ef985af6dbfc9
We used its leave-one-neutral-aversive-pair-out scheme as the unbiased within-patient baseline. Our within-patient block AUC (median 0.89 at 24-s blocks) agrees with its high AUC at long windows.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003374.v1.1.1
The analysis used the recorded OpenNeuro ds003374 version 1.1.1 data files; its saved version-specific metadata identifies the dataset and records CC0.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116705
This is the source paper identified by the dataset metadata for the human amygdala recordings used here.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAmygdala decoders generalized across 24-s aversive and neutral blocks in 9 patients, with no evidence of within-block code change
Uses the archived ds003374 amygdala band-power features (features.npz) and the shrinkage-LDA decoder setup of this publication.
- usesIn five bilateral patients, left-amygdala band power decoded aversive blocks better on average than right-amygdala band power
Uses its archived per-amygdala features (Fside), LDA settings and leave-one-pair-out CV. Tests the laterality question that its Limits section left open.
- usesOne 48-s calibration pair supports above-chance within-patient decoding of amygdala SEEG video blocks
Uses the amygdala band-power features (features.npz), the LDA settings and the upstream feature code of this publication. Measures the per-patient calibration length that it recommended.