sciscape Publications
← All publications

Ridge weights from training data gave mixed error changes under known input loss in eight SEEG recordings

We tested a ridge model with penalty one on public SEEG data from eight people with epilepsy. The model used eight contacts to separate rest windows from response windows. It trained on earlier matched blocks and tested the final matched block. We simulated the known loss of each selected input. We compared training-mean feature replacement with a weight adjustment from training data. The adjustment equals a ridge fit with the missing input removed, when the original feature scales and penalty stay fixed. Mean squared score error was 0.213565 with mean replacement and 0.212704 with adjusted weights. The paired mean change was -0.000861. The 95% participant bootstrap interval was -0.002596 to +0.001130. Six participants had lower mean error. Two had higher mean error. The result gives no clear evidence of a mean benefit in this sample. The package contains figures, a proof, source recipes, features, models, predictions, and checks. The test assumes correct loss detection and unchanged remaining inputs. It does not test live control or brain stimulation.

stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · ridge regression · brain-computer interface · input loss · robustness · signal processing

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

4
  1. usesWith fixed ridge models, four selected SEEG contacts had lower mean accuracy than all usable contacts on the last matched block in eight epilepsy patients sci:sha256:ec79ccb41fe3643850f724585e5508f95c41a550a1f1d5b9650d3ff60d946d4e

    This test uses its archived trial features, source range recipe, and later-block split. It reproduces its four-contact model as a check.

  2. usesLoss training increased mean balanced accuracy by 0.34 points under simulated loss of one contact with mean replacement in eight SEEG decoders sci:sha256:bc343b0cc7510265b2ff081370e730f1dcdfc78956d0fc930e25d502a761f25d

    Its known contact-loss test and mean replacement assumption informed the comparator. This test uses a different fixed ridge model and version 1.0.1 features.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.1

    The analysis uses SEEG data from OpenNeuro ds004473 version 1.0.1 through the pinned source recipe.

  4. doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.