NEON pitfall traps at 44 US sites show no net change in ground beetle activity-density from 2013 to 2023 (−0.6%/year, 95% CI −3.5 to +2.3) with a constant trap design
Question: did the number of ground beetles (Carabidae) that NEON pitfall traps catch per day change from 2013 to 2023? NEON removed one trap per plot in 2018 and four of ten plots per site in 2023. Approach: we used 104,622 trap collections (244,815 beetles) from NEON product DP1.10022.001, RELEASE-2026, through the neonDivData package. We checked these data against raw NEON tables: 99.9% of 88,824 trap totals for 2013-2021 were identical. Our primary estimator used only the plots and trap positions that NEON sampled in all years. For each site, a quasi-Poisson model with year, plot-trap and season terms and a trap-day offset gave annual indices. We fitted a linear trend to each site series and pooled 44 site trends with a random-effects model. Findings: the pooled change was -0.6% per year (95% CI -3.5 to +2.3). In 20 alternative analyses the estimate was between -1.7 and +0.4% per year, and all intervals included zero and -0.92% per year (a published mean insect decline). Site trends were very different (SD about 8% per year): four sites decreased and six increased significantly. Climate, latitude and forest cover did not explain these differences. At 27 of 46 sites, the plots that NEON kept had catch rates more than 25% different from the plots that it stopped. This caused site trend errors of up to 15 points per year in a naive ratio estimator, but no net error. Of 429 site-species populations, 6 decreased and 3 increased significantly after FDR correction. Simulations with the measured variance show a power of 0.15-0.31 to detect a 1% per year decline with 11 years and 44 sites; equal site trends would need about 20 years for 80% power. Limitations: activity-density also changes with weather and beetle activity; series are 5-11 years; provisional 2024-2026 data were not accessible.
ground beetles · Carabidae · NEON · insect decline · pitfall traps · activity-density · population trends · monitoring design · statistical power · random-effects meta-analysis · biodiversity monitoring
References
7- usesdoi:10.48443/q9ne-6b77
Source data: NEON ground beetle pitfall data DP1.10022.001, RELEASE-2026.
- usesdoi:10.1002/ecs2.4141
neonDivData package (commit 3bfc1168cb) gave the trap-level cleaned beetle table that we analysed.
- doi:10.1002/ecs2.1744
Describes the NEON carabid sampling design that we account for.
- doi:10.1126/science.aax9931
Meta-analytic mean terrestrial insect decline (-0.92% per year) used as a reference value.
- doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1269-4
US LTER analysis with no net insect decline; context for our result.
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02194.x
Carabid declines in the UK monitoring network; context.
- doi:10.1111/geb.13670
Earlier use of NEON carabid data for habitat-trait climate responses, not continental trends.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- The 1994–2008 site and habitat trends of UK ECN carabid beetles did not continue in 2009–2015; later indices moved back toward the earlier mean at 11 site units
Related SCI test of ground beetle activity-density trends in US NEON pitfall data.