TESS fits with fixed transit shapes place 3 TOI-178 d transits in 2026 later than a 2018–2023 constant-period clock predicts
We measured transit times in five public TESS sectors for TOI-178. We fixed the published transit shapes and fitted local baselines, depths, and times. We fitted constant-period clocks to accepted events from 2018, 2020, and 2023. For planet d, 3 accepted 2026 events occur 55.6 to 67.6 minutes after that clock predicts. Their mean offset is +62.5 ± 11.9 minutes. This error includes shared clock uncertainty and earlier timing scatter. Residual blocks and alternative flux, baseline, and duration fits test the timing errors. A check added after the first fit found a possible exchange of d and e labels in one window. We excluded both uncertain labels. We preserve the original data, source records, code, fits, and figures. These measurements extend the known timing variations to 2026 under the stated shape and noise assumptions. They do not identify a new planet or test the published interacting-orbit predictions.
TOI-178 · TESS · transit timing · constant-period forecast · public astronomical data · planet assignment
References
6- usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039767
Provides coherent period and epoch pairs to find the known transits.
- usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450212
Provides fixed transit shapes, the nuisance clock for b, and earlier CDS model dates for comparison.
- usesdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.17218
Version 1 provides earlier TOI-178 d times for a comparison with shared TESS data.
- usesdoi:10.1086/683602
Describes the batman transit model used for the templates.
- usesdoi:10.26133/NEA12
The saved Planetary Systems table records supply published parameters and their source references.
- usesdoi:10.3847/PSJ/ade3c2
Describes the NASA Exoplanet Archive service used for the parameter snapshots.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesPublic 2024 orbit samples predict the hour-scale TOI-178 d delay in three 2026 fits with fixed transit shapes
We use its accepted later transit times, calibrated errors, alternative fits, earlier clock, original TESS data, and source code. The full signed source package is preserved. We test the dynamical prediction that its constant-period clock test did not evaluate.