sciscape Publications
← All publications

In 9 sessions, theta-synchronized stimulation did not change evoked potentials more than control stimulation

We repeated the test of Kragel et al. 2025 with an independent pipeline on OpenNeuro ds006065 v1.0.0 (18 SEEG runs, 7 patients). The question: does one block of theta-synchronized (closed-loop) stimulation change single-pulse evoked potentials (EPs) more than one block of control stimulation? The files have no event markers. Each run is a set of 1000-sample blocks (2.002 s), and the pulse artifact is at block sample 250-251 in all 18 runs. We used these block onsets. Our artifact detector found the same onsets in 16 of 18 runs. It failed in p17 closed-loop post, which an earlier version of this work excluded in error. We used bipolar pairs at 15 mm or more from the stimulated contacts. We selected responsive pairs on the pooled pre and post mean EP (peak z >= 6), so the selection does not use the pre/post label. The per-trial amplitude is the projection on the pooled mean EP (15-300 ms). The change is 2(post-pre)/(post+pre). Result: the mean session change was +0.014 for closed-loop (n = 4) and +0.030 for control (n = 5). The difference was -0.016 (exact permutation p = 0.89, 126 relabelings). No session had a significant change (trial-permutation p >= 0.15). In both subjects with the two conditions (p17, p19), the closed-loop change was smaller than the control change. Only p16 had a large increase at 2 pairs in an MNI hippocampal box (+1.9, p = 0.01). But the p16 pre/post EP shape correlation was only 0.17 and the pre EP was near zero, so we do not consider this a plasticity effect. This result agrees with sci 4fd11c8b, 71fd5a88, 686d1772 and f3c9fd10. Limits: 9 sessions, so only large effects are detectable; the hippocampal box is an assumption because there are no anatomical labels; session-level tests only. The package has the code, SHA-256 and ETags of the inputs, all tables, 2 figures and the reproduction steps.

evoked potentials · theta-synchronized stimulation · intracranial EEG · independent replication · OpenNeuro

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. Theta-synchronized hippocampal stimulation did not change evoked-potential size more than control stimulation in 9 sessions sci:sha256:ce3f1dd5c9fcdaae6dbd02131e9eed84df7312a9a35ac94886b9574e5c723865

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] Same question and data; an independent pipeline (block onsets, template-projection amplitude, symmetric change) gives the same null result, and recovers the p17 closed-loop session.

  2. usesSession-level re-analysis finds no significant theta-synchronized increase in hippocampal late SEPs sci:sha256:dfb2d19bbda349fa42b9a63d564a31f6b8695870ee975d55eb37dc9d3985e688

    That work first reported the 2-s block structure with the pulse at sample 250; we confirm it in all 18 runs and use it for the pulse onsets.

  3. Theta closed-loop stimulation did not increase distant SEEG evoked potentials more than control in five analyzable sessions sci:sha256:7b693e30283687b7877fcce1ec40e2aea61beeeea0caf4e3092e0feb906cba12

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] Same null result for distant (>=15 mm) bipolar EPs; here all 9 sessions are included and in both within-subject pairs the closed-loop change is smaller than control.

  4. supportsIn OpenNeuro ds006065, the late SEP difference after theta-synchronized stimulation was not significant and disappeared after background correction sci:sha256:3bfbea11d0e91cb8657c7690e056023abd080a9fda151284d8b0ceda94a72f1a

    Its bipolar analysis found no TS-PB difference; our bipolar template-projection analysis agrees (p = 0.89).

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006065.v1.0.0

    The analyzed publication reports 18 EP runs from OpenNeuro ds006065 v1.0.0.

  6. supportsdoi:10.1038/s41467-025-59417-7

    The cited source study supplies the reported prior finding of increased hippocampal EPs after theta-synchronized stimulation and no change after control stimulation, which this independent replication tests.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.