sciscape Publications
← All publications

Shared site failure reduced two-step route survival in eight worm maps under equal contact survival

We tested random route survival in eight public C. elegans brain maps. We kept 141 cells with an output annotation in all maps and tested all 19,740 ordered cell pairs. One model failed each annotated chemical site as a unit. A reference failed each contact independently with the same survival probability. A proof shows that shared sites cannot increase direct or two-step route survival under these assumptions. At contact survival 0.2, the mean reduction relative to the reference was 1.38 to 4.30 percent across maps. Exact reference probabilities and conditional Monte Carlo estimates gave the map results. Small circuit enumeration checked the method. The ordering is a property of the model, not evidence of special biological wiring. Unknown release rates, ignored electrical links, partial maps, and one animal at most ages limit use. These are structural model results, not activity measurements.

connectome · C. elegans · polyadic synapses · route survival · shared failure · conditional Monte Carlo

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

3
  1. usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8

    Source of the eight developmental brain maps.

  2. useshttps://github.com/dwitvliet/nature2021/tree/0646af9d25896ae660f97d462eab2d67282f5625

    Pinned external synaptic site annotations; raw records not bundled.

  3. reviewsObserved site groups gave cuts within fixed-count shuffle ranges in two adult worm models sci:sha256:3b371cc9adf8e1022851b0ca78ee2ee1007057fa27597d3b919bfdae217014e6

    Prior worst-case site-cut calculation differs from random one- or two-step route survival; no files reused.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.