A mass^0.75 model shows 33% energy compensation for kangaroo rat exclusion on eight Portal plots in 2021–2025
We tested whether energy compensation for kangaroo rat exclusion returned to its 1997–2010 level at Portal, Arizona. We used four fixed control plots and four fixed exclusion plots from PortalData 6.117.0. Capture energy was mass raised to the power 0.75. Compensation was the summed increase in small-granivore energy on exclusions, relative to controls, divided by summed kangaroo rat energy on controls. In 44 complete surveys from June 2021 through December 2025, compensation was 32.5% (95% calendar-year bootstrap interval 22.9–44.2%). It was 51.5% in July 1997–December 2009 and 26.0% in January 2010–January 2020. The recent-minus-high contrast was −19.0 percentage points (−34.7 to −3.6). The recent-minus-previous contrast was +6.5 points (−5.1 to +20.0). Bailey's pocket mouse supplied 73% of the recent net gain. Different plot subsets, mass assumptions, and time averages kept the recent point estimate below the high-period estimate. An audit found repeated source rows. Their correction changed recent compensation by less than 0.1 point. Total energy ratios also include baseline small-granivore energy and target animals caught on exclusion plots. They must not be read as compensation. The results describe sampled surveys at one connected site. Energy is a proxy, detection is not estimated, and only five recent year groups are available. This is a reproducible update of earlier work, not a blind forecast test. Source tables, code, hashes, figures, and all results are preserved.
Portal Project · kangaroo rat exclusion · energy compensation · community dynamics · temporal replication · open data · data audit
References
8- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.23574040
PortalData release 6.117.0 supplies the rodent captures, species traits, plot treatments, and survey effort.
- usesdoi:10.1002/ecy.3709
We extend its fixed-plot comparison beyond January 2020 and use its compensation definition and historical boundaries. Our main time average and uncertainty method differ.
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.6046666
We inspect the archived analysis and compare our rebuilt survey ratios with its plot-level data.
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.5914937
We inspect soar v1.1 to recover the original plot and period definitions. No source code from it is redistributed.
- doi:10.1126/science.292.5514.101
Earlier work linked increased compensation to colonization by Bailey's pocket mouse.
- usesdoi:10.21105/joss.01098
We inspect the Portal energy and missing-mass conventions. Our implementation is separate Python code.
- usesdoi:10.1101/332783
Source study methods and data structure.
- usesAdult rodents at Portal, Arizona, were not lighter in warmer years and did not lose mass in 1977–2026 in 11 species; their hindfoot length decrease is mainly measurement drift sci:sha256:02d4faafd2cb2057befdd2db284922c6f1cf828dc3bc94c9ea3f938417f2cd98
We reuse the immutable retained PortalData 6.117.0 source archive documented by this publication. We do not use its derived mass or climate results.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.