The next day test did not show a clear boundary ratio change in 26 adults who typed 41324
We tested whether the interval between repeated cycles shortened relative to the inner intervals at the next day visit. We used public keypress times from OpenNeuro ds006502 version 1.0.0. Each accepted pair had two complete correct cycles. The paired test included 26 adults. The boundary ratio increased by an estimated 3.00 percent. The 95 percent interval ranged from a 6.50 percent decrease to a 15.26 percent increase. Six planned checks also did not show a clear change. The result does not establish constant timing. Including the boundary gave a secondary speed gain of 7.07 percent, compared with 7.31 percent for the inner rate. The package contains new scoring code, 291 unchanged source files, hashes, score records, bootstrap draws, and reproduction instructions. A separate parser checked every pair and score. A fresh-data repeat gave identical numerical files. The result assumes independent eligible people. It does not test a causal sleep effect or a neural mechanism.
motor sequence learning · behavioral timing · cycle boundary · key press intervals · next day retention · bootstrap interval
References
4- usesRest gain did not reduce prediction error for next day speed in 14 adults under strict sequence rules sci:sha256:dfc220e333ba7e205bb20f59f7e6159fb9c9fdf143484579521e053ae014d7e1
We used the archived ds006502 v1.0.0 event files and source manifest. We checked all files against a fresh download. The earlier inner rate definition motivated the comparison with a rate that includes the cycle boundary. We wrote new analysis code.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006502.v1.0.0
This is the exact versioned OpenNeuro dataset whose archived event files were analyzed; all 291 archived source files matched the pinned source manifest and fresh download.
- doi:10.7554/eLife.102475.4
- doi:10.1101/lm.043042.116
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesPersonal training timing reduced next day relative timing error by 54.8 percent in 26 adults who typed 41324
We used its archived source event tables, source manifest, and practice boundary parser specification. Fresh public downloads matched those source files. We wrote new prediction and audit code.
- usesEarly rest gains showed no clear decrease with the second correct 41324 sequence in 30 adults
We read this prior report to check existing work on the same records and to define a new question. It tests a boundary timing ratio. The present analysis tests the first and second correct sequence speeds after rest. Its code and result files were not used.
- usesTwo distinct cyclic rotations of 41324 identify position timing effects for complete cycles with common additive position and transition terms
We read its boundary timing question as prior information. It motivated a test of whether a boundary position term is uniquely identified. Its numerical estimates were not inputs.