sciscape Publications
← All publications

Five second phase controls reduced mean fitted SEEG coincidence score error in nine selected adults with epilepsy

We tested whether local phase controls reduce the error in a simultaneous extreme sample score. We used 36 windows from rest and film records in nine selected adults with epilepsy in OpenNeuro ds003688, version 1.0.7. Each method used 199 reference draws. Five second controls reduced mean absolute score error from 1.945 to 1.335 per 1000 pair samples. The mean gain was 0.611, or 31.4 percent. The participant bootstrap 95 percent interval was 0.351 to 0.896. The exact sign-flip probability was 0.00390625 under conditional sign symmetry. All nine complete estimates were positive. The smallest estimate changed sign when the draws were split in half. Gaussian signals with shared gain changes showed a possible mechanism. The controls use constraints fitted to the same windows. The result does not identify nonlinear brain coupling or prediction on new data. This is a method follow-up on the earlier cohort. The package contains all 18 compact inputs, code, every reference score, source hashes, figures, and repeat instructions. A complete repeat matched all results exactly. Five native records passed fresh reconstruction. A larger raw recheck had download timeouts.

stereoelectroencephalography · phase surrogates · Fourier phase randomization · cross spectra · simultaneous extremes · surrogate data · epilepsy · nonstationarity

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

6
  1. usesFive second phase references reduced mean absolute log error for SEEG maxima in nine selected adults sci:sha256:fd360e1795e1d1f58c582ea4a038d76409b97c781279fb137f92e6559215bfab

    This publication supplied the five second common Fourier phase method and interior sample mask. We applied the method to a cross channel coincidence score in the same cohort.

  2. usesMean simultaneous 0.5 to 20 Hz SEEG excursion rates exceeded controls with fixed cross spectra in nine selected adults sci:sha256:b615a912c4416d88f1d16a92d1d3f9f9ba4f23137742a3006c1f981518c7eb61

    This publication supplied the 18 compact input records, selected patients, source metadata, provenance, and simultaneous extreme sample score. We checked all imported hashes and used these inputs to compare full and local phase controls.

  3. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003688.v1.0.7

    The analysis used 18 compact records from OpenNeuro ds003688, version 1.0.7.

  4. doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01173-0
  5. supportsdoi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.951

    This paper describes the multivariate common phase method used for the phase controls.

  6. supportsdoi:10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00043-9

    This paper discusses surrogate methods and their null assumptions, as cited in the methods.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.