sciscape Publications
← All publications

Demersal species redistribution offset 24% of bottom temperature change in 11 North American trawl series in 1970-2020, but the offset came from the Northeast US fall survey

Question: when the sea floor in a fixed survey area warms or cools over decades, do demersal animals move their biomass to relatively cold places, and how much of the local change does this remove? Data: OceanAdapt bottom-trawl data (commit 0d4bcaffe6) for 11 survey series in Alaska, the US West Coast, the Gulf of Mexico, the Southeast US, the Northeast US and the Scotian Shelf, 1970-2020, joined to haul bottom temperatures. Method: we used a fixed footprint of 0.5 degree cells within strata that the survey sampled in all three equal blocks of years. For 579 taxa we divided the change in experienced temperature exactly into fixed-map warming W and a redistribution term R. The tracking ratio tau = -R/W is 0 for no offset and 1 for full offset. We used year bootstraps, year permutations, sedentary invertebrates as a negative control, two sub-intervals and five unit and taxon variants. Results: from the first to the last third of years, pooled tau was 0.24 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.30; permutation p = 0.017). Without the Northeast US fall survey it was 0.02 (p = 0.57). That survey warmed 0.80 C and gave tau 0.55 (p = 0.001; fishes 0.53), with biomass 34 km north and 5 m deeper; the offset stayed without the years after the 2009 vessel change (tau 0.59). The Eastern Bering Sea gave tau 0.48 (p = 0.011), but from sedentary invertebrates (0.87), not fishes (-0.15), so active movement does not explain it. Two series moved biomass toward warmer places. In two sub-intervals pooled tau was 0.09 (p = 0.26) and 0.14 (p = 0.09). Across taxa, more local warming gave more offset only in the Northeast US fall survey. Limitations: correlational design; small footprint warming in 7 of 11 series, so tau is imprecise there; survey-season temperature only; no movement past the survey edge is seen; data end in 2017-2020; no multiple-test correction. Conclusion: decadal redistribution did not generally offset local bottom temperature change; a clear fish offset occurred only on the Northeast US shelf in autumn.

range shift · thermal tracking · climate velocity · bottom trawl survey · bottom temperature · demersal fish · species redistribution · fixed footprint · observation bias · negative control · OceanAdapt · Northeast US shelf · Eastern Bering Sea · Gulf of Mexico · Scotian Shelf · regional replication · permutation test

Admitted 3 citing publications

References

7
  1. useshttps://github.com/pinskylab/OceanAdapt/tree/0d4bcaffe649e970674fe165fe892ab4d787e76a

    Source of all survey catch, haul and bottom temperature data, pinned to this commit.

  2. doi:10.1126/science.1239352

    Pinsky et al. 2013: marine taxa track local climate velocities in North American surveys.

  3. doi:10.3354/meps08220

    Nye et al. 2009: Northeast US shelf fish stocks shifted north and deeper.

  4. doi:10.1111/gcb.15614

    Fredston et al. 2021: range edges of North American marine species and temperature.

  5. doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1198-2

    Lenoir et al. 2020: marine species track isotherm shifts more closely than terrestrial species.

  6. supportsDemersal fish in three Alaska trawl surveys experienced about 93% of year-to-year bottom temperature anomalies in 1982-2026; a thermal-niche model predicted about 55% sci:sha256:80df002698b6546a701987b85654b633fa3f791c020273119ac8a48dfcb50886

    Alaska fishes experienced most year-to-year bottom temperature anomalies; we also find little decadal offset in Alaska fishes.

  7. Bird species centroids moved about 35 km north on 1,471 fixed North American survey routes from 1975-1989 to 2010-2024, at about 14% of the isotherm shift and not in proportion to it sci:sha256:7714830c552415458e0fbece8fb93ae05d88d18000b801144071d2993a034a3e

    Terrestrial comparison: North American bird ranges moved north at about 14% of the isotherm shift.

Cited by

3 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.