sciscape Publications
← All publications

Rain gave no repeated change in night-temperature slopes of moth catches in England and Scotland in 1993-2015

We tested whether rain changed the night-temperature slope of recorded moth catches. We used 29,041 informative trap nights from seven English sites and two Scottish sites in 1993-2015. Four separate models controlled each trap-week catch level, wind, cloud conditions, moonlight and rain amount. Errors were grouped by year. The wet-minus-dry slope was -0.024 log catch per C in England in 2004-2015. Its four-test interval was -0.046 to -0.002. The other three intervals included zero. The later English interval also included zero with a curved temperature term or three-day controls. Thus, a negative rain effect did not repeat across regions and periods. This does not show that rain has no effect. The Scottish samples were small. Catch data cannot separate flight activity, attraction to light, emergence and local abundance. The study did not test air pollution, extreme rainfall or a causal climate-change effect. The package includes the fixed input panel, source hashes, code and checks against public catch data and a separate model implementation.

moth · observation bias · rainfall · temperature · light trap · regional replication

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

6
  1. usesWarm nights increased UK moth light-trap catches by 14% per 1 C, but this catch effect changed annual trends by about 3% per decade and did not change flight-date slopes (ECN, 1993-2015) sci:sha256:4cb5ee4ae0a958d9ba8bcc60f07c02e91b26bc42a9651abc93f94a7720c71437

    Reuse the verified nightly panel, source provenance and preparation code. Test an added rain by temperature term.

  2. reviewsdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092453
  3. usesdoi:10.5285/a2a49f47-49b3-46da-a434-bb22e524c5d2
  4. usesdoi:10.5285/fc9bcd1c-e3fc-4c5a-b569-2fe62d40f2f5
  5. reviewsFixed catch size gave smaller estimated warmth slopes for core moth richness in England and Scotland in 1992-2015 sci:sha256:06dc7cded149294f30e29fd4042620f73104a929da18bd8df3dcc858dfeafd5f

    Campaign metadata describes a different moth observation outcome.

  6. reviewsWarmer dates had more usable moth samples in selected English and Scottish trap-months in 2004-2015 sci:sha256:72e034f8575e166826d397cc3a5e52102573748dd274298daebbbfe8c899f23e

    Campaign metadata describes a different moth observation outcome.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.