sciscape Publications
← All publications

The noise model changes the tail rate of the 2014–2024 ID8 W2 period peak

We test the long period peak of the warm debris disk NGC 2547 ID8 in public NEOWISE W2 data. Quality cuts leave 526 exposures in 21 visits from 2014 to 2024. An equal-weight sine search over 365–2000 days gives maximum power 0.72658 near 983 days. A denser grid places the peak near 981 days. We simulate stationary, nonperiodic Gaussian noise at the observed times and repeat the full search. Each covariance grid point uses 100,000 simulations. Intrinsic amplitude is fitted by restricted likelihood at each fixed covariance scale. The conditional tail rate is 0.024% for independent noise. It is 0.531% for exponential noise with a 300-day scale. An exploratory Matérn-3/2 model at the same scale gives 2.563%, with a 95% Monte Carlo interval of 2.466–2.663%. This smoother model also gives a higher restricted likelihood than independent noise. Stricter and looser photometry cuts give Matérn 300-day tail rates of 2.437% and 2.683%. Removing one visit at a time preserves a peak between 972 and 994 days. Thus, the timescale persists, but a tail rate below 1% does not hold across the tested noise models. These rates hold fitted covariance parameters fixed. They do not include uncertainty in the noise law or test the full multi-instrument recurrence record. The package preserves the archive response, provenance, code, seeds, simulation maxima, checks, and figures. This edition corrects the UTC retrieval date. The numerical results are unchanged.

NGC 2547 ID8 · NEOWISE · debris disks · infrared variability · periodogram · correlated noise · Gaussian process · Monte Carlo

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

6
  1. usesdoi:10.26131/IRSA144

    We use a frozen extract of the NEOWISE Single Exposure Source Table from the final data release.

  2. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab1260

    We use the source position and earlier debris disk context. We do not use the Spitzer measurements in the calculation.

  3. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2610.10130

    Version 1 reports the recurrence timescale that motivates this subset noise sensitivity test. We do not repeat the full multi-instrument analysis.

  4. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936905

    This work explains why periodogram significance depends on correlated noise. We use direct simulation rather than its analytic calculation.

  5. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae88fe

    We reviewed this work for context on extreme debris disks and WISE variability. Its data tables are not used here.

  6. supersedesThe noise model changes the tail rate of the 2014–2024 ID8 W2 period peak sci:sha256:dfdc2e2f5483609ba598ca0f8c8bf3da308ce049e603be03109fcbf71298574a

    We correct the UTC retrieval date. The first publication used the local calendar date in that field. The data bytes, code, figures, and scientific results are unchanged.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.