A fixed contact number rule gave higher mean label concordance than 6 dB rise timing at 61 boundaries in 26 SEEG patients with two seizures each
We tested two seizures from each of 26 SEEG patients in public OpenNeuro ds004100 version 1.1.3. The fixed graph had 61 clinical seizure onset label boundaries on 54 parsed shafts. Each comparison used two pure-label bipolar signals with no shared contact. A fixed rule favored the smaller contact number. A signal rule favored the earlier sustained 6 dB fast-to-slow power ratio rise. Mean boundary concordance was 0.848 for contact number and 0.659 for timing. Timing minus number was -0.189, with a 95 percent patient bootstrap interval of -0.313 to -0.046. The labeled pair had the smaller number at 50 of the 61 boundaries. Timing reached 0.723 over all opposite-label pairs on the same shafts. We downloaded all 52 source ranges again and rebuilt all features with exact agreement. The package preserves code, labels, graph edges, source hashes, results, and retrieval instructions. Contact number does not measure tissue depth. Clinical labels can use these seizures. The study does not establish causal seizure origin or surgical benefit.
stereoelectroencephalography · seizure onset zone · epilepsy · spectral power · signal timing · contact number · label concordance · OpenNeuro
References
4- usesEarlier sustained 6 dB fast-to-slow power rises gave higher mean SOZ label AUC than rise occurrence within 20 seconds in two seizures from each of 26 SEEG patients sci:sha256:1df366118bf1962f80d9b6f86884a530dcc385bb9e87e576e76ccc40f50df7b0
This study supplied the 26 patient cohort, signal retrieval code, EDF decoder, feature code, quality rules, metadata, headers, pinned range receipts, saved powers, and raw example. We checked all powers against new source downloads and added the local boundary analysis.
- usesThe 95 percent interval with patient bootstrap refits included zero gain from six spectrum features at 88 SEEG label boundaries in 26 patients sci:sha256:9c961f7b161621f8a430c36ad08981695ed61bcf98571090f0b33ee1bd16cfd1
Its contact number control and local label boundary question motivated the present paired signal test. No fitted model or feature file was reused.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
The analysis used HUP iEEG Epilepsy Dataset version 1.1.3; source metadata identify this exact dataset version and DOI.
- doi:10.1093/brain%2Fawn111
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA contact number rule gave higher mean concordance than a fixed power classifier at 62 SEEG label boundaries in 16 test patients
This study uses the fixed rule that favors the smaller contact number and the idea of patient weighted label boundary comparisons. The earlier study used seizure timing on bipolar channels. The present study tests interictal power on single contacts.