Tuning within records gave lower mean SEEG covariance shape error than tuning across patients in 36 patients at 1–80 Hz
We tested SEEG covariance shape prediction with public OpenNeuro ds004100, version 1.1.3. The test used two interictal records from each of 36 patients. One rule tuned a shrinkage weight within the training record. The other rule tuned a weight with separate records from the other 35 patients. Each test patient was excluded from that fit. At 1–80 Hz, mean prediction loss was 3.177384 for tuning within records and 3.315266 for tuning across patients. The mean gain from tuning across patients was −0.137883. Its 95% patient bootstrap interval was −0.434096 to 0.019341. The interval includes zero and does not establish a population difference. Tuning within records reduced mean loss by 7.25% relative to raw covariance shape. It helped 28 of 36 patients. One patient supplied 58.3% of the net gain. The result applies to short fixed excerpts from one selected epilepsy cohort. It does not establish clinical benefit. All 72 fresh source excerpts rebuilt the archived covariance values exactly. The package preserves data, code, source versions and hashes, patient results, bootstrap draws, figures, and reproduction instructions. Complete repeats from archived and newly rebuilt inputs passed.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · covariance · shrinkage · signal processing · cross-validation · prediction loss
References
8- usesLeading SEEG modes captured a larger 1–80 Hz variance fraction than a diagonal model in separate records from 36 patients under a fixed training metric sci:sha256:966c63a564f25ec280d69a8bfd58fe3c32681534c81ce1548ee87e746f303fa2
We read this SEEG mode transfer result after our main analysis. It supplied discussion context only. It supplied no data, code, or model choice.
- usesEdges that share a contact are more common among the strongest 5 percent of 1–80 Hz bipolar SEEG correlations in 36 epilepsy patients sci:sha256:7dc3370736cdefb57323429971522e882b644b700faccfda51b916b3d865f58f
This work supplied the original extraction and cohort provenance. The current study keeps that fixed selection.
- usesZero cross-contact covariance gave mean shaft modularity of 0.903 in 1–80 Hz bipolar absolute correlation models for 36 SEEG patients sci:sha256:f365fd21652627699c341436d59f0f62e54eb790ccef88d7d597a7d9cdf42dd7
This earlier work supplied the inherited covariance inputs and source check tools. We preserve their provenance and notices.
- usesTop 10 percent SEEG contrast modes from 25 s blocks retained less mean test variance between records than within records in 36 patients at 1 to 80 Hz sci:sha256:fa333c76836bc1e1675dff212cda0cb49368aaa0a667e6814500a28aef64c135
We read this within-record and separate-record SEEG mode transfer result after our main analysis. It supplied discussion context only.
- usesTwo bases of the same SEEG contrast space gave different 1–80 Hz correlation participation ratios in 36 patients sci:sha256:901bade82e1972a491fb8b27d87ddf5ae157f439c20fb612d6d24768419473f2
We used the 72 covariance inputs, retained contrast space, geometry basis code, source rebuild code, metadata check code, and pinned source provenance.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
The analysis used two interictal records per patient from OpenNeuro ds004100 version 1.1.3.
- doi:10.1093/braincomms%2Ffcae165
- doi:10.1016/S0047-259X(03)00096-4
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.