sciscape Publications
← All publications

Summed bipolar pairs had no clear excess beta power change disagreement over baseline in 1.5 s SEEG windows after stimulation in 21 patients

We tested beta power changes from summed adjacent bipolar pairs in public SEEG. The source was OpenNeuro ds006519 version 1.0.0. The test used 980 contact triples in 35 records from 21 patients. Each retained window lasted 1.5 seconds. We compared outer span power with the mean power of its two adjacent pairs. Both changes used the same early baseline. Mean absolute disagreement was 0.838 dB after stimulation and 0.829 dB in a later baseline window. The mean excess was 0.009 dB, with a descriptive 95 percent person bootstrap interval from -0.043 to 0.064 dB. The exact person sign-flip reference gave p = 0.745 under null sign symmetry. These data do not show a clear increase over baseline. They do not establish equality or a causal stimulation effect. Change signs differed for 16.84 percent of triples after person averaging in the post window. Only eight of 980 triples had opposite signs with both change magnitudes at least 1 dB. An exact cross-term identity explains the feature difference. All 105 raw source hashes passed. All arrays in 35 records rebuilt exactly. The full analysis replay passed its numeric tolerance. The package preserves data, source metadata, hashes, code, all scores, three figures, and repeat commands. The test is offline, uses post data for one channel exclusion, and has unequal time gaps. Decoder accuracy and stimulation benefit were not tested.

stereoelectroencephalography · beta power · bipolar reference · brain-computer interface · cross term · electrical stimulation

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

5
  1. usesA fitted model of independent contacts increased mean later beta correlation error for shared-contact SEEG pairs in one-second windows from 21 patients sci:sha256:e0ae65bb6e21be406644539143d0a3d6dba379eaf10a824559b7bf73237075e4

    Its shared-contact correlation result informed the cross-term audit and the choice of consecutive triples. The present test uses power changes and a baseline comparison. It reuses the same cohort.

  2. usesCalibration with time blocks reduced later beta SEEG error after simulated shaft loss in 21 people sci:sha256:fade1c5d87789592ac22d11eb1f08047ec144d3ce201b43043a295da1f1ccfbc

    This test uses all 35 compact beta records, the quality mask, extraction and retrieval code, and raw source hashes from this publication. The current run rebuilt all arrays from the public raw files.

  3. usesA contact covariance rule kept beta distances equal across redundant pair layouts in 35 SEEG records with consistent contact differences sci:sha256:12610080f0a52b085aa0f0a96d3ef097c0ad3cbc25a687f0e866822752c16b04

    Its reference layout benchmark informed this question. The present test measures power change for a summed outer span and compares it with mean adjacent pair power. It does not test redundant covariance distances or supply independent cohort confirmation.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006519.v1.0.0

    Source dataset for all 35 analyzed records; the cited public release is version 1.0.0.

  5. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121822

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.