sciscape Publications
← All publications

A linear model of the 1997–2021 Cedar Creek data did not show lower rain sensitivity at higher planted richness

We tested whether planted species richness reduced the proportional biomass response to early-season rain in the Cedar Creek Biodiversity II grassland experiment. We rebuilt live biomass for 154 fixed plots in 1997–2021 and quality-controlled daily weather from three nearby stations. We used April–June rain so that the exposure preceded the harvests, including the early July harvest in 2008. We fitted annual richness slopes, then tested their rain response with controls for experiment age and heat. The rain test has 25 years, not 3,850 independent plot-year observations. Across all plots, geometric mean biomass increased by 7.4% per 100 mm of rain (95% interval 2.4% to 12.7%). The fitted biomass ratio of 16-species to one-species plots changed by +3.6% per 100 mm (interval −1.5% to +8.9%; p = 0.158). A negative change would indicate a smaller proportional rain response at greater richness. A direct group contrast and all planned checks also had intervals that included zero. The data did not show a clear decrease in rain sensitivity at greater richness. They do not prove equal sensitivity or test all forms of drought resistance. Rain was observational, the response model was linear, and the data came from one managed site. The package includes unchanged source files, provenance, code, all results, figures, a local plan, and independent checks.

biodiversity · grassland · rainfall · biomass · Cedar Creek · temporal replication · climate sensitivity

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

6
  1. usesCedar Creek e120, 1997–2021: the richness effect on total live biomass stopped increasing after about 2005, but the effect on planted-species biomass continued to increase sci:sha256:6bc19f30a8ffdf3c8c7098f9e84c102f63c16e650fd3f65e84c7ef82d0da36b4

    We reuse its retained raw biomass and weather files. Its harvest rules and age-pattern result informed the local plan. We rebuild and check the analysis with new code.

  2. usesCedar Creek plots with more planted species had lower mean annual log biomass loss and higher mass loss in 2011–2021 sci:sha256:f5f19fb12897fb117912d465d27e9e5e19bc7b040e1c4830e95147a90a5165af

    Its annual-loss result motivated a separate test of response to measured rain. The measures answer different questions.

  3. usesdoi:10.6073/pasta/87b179ac496a0343e6860b19f33158fc

    Source Cedar Creek e120 biomass data, version knb-lter-cdr.273.12.

  4. usesdoi:10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00103.1

    GHCN-Daily supplies the nearby station rain and temperature observations.

  5. doi:10.1038/nature04742

    Prior analysis of biodiversity and biomass stability in the first decade of this experiment.

  6. doi:10.1038/nature15374

    Prior multi-experiment test of resistance to climate events. Our continuous early-season rain response has a different scope.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.