sciscape Publications
← All publications

Two activity models retain at least 93% of 197.8-day signal information in 261 HD 40307 HARPS nights

We tested whether fixed linear activity terms can hide a circular signal at the reported 197.8-day period of HD 40307 g. We used 480 public HARPS CCF exposures on 261 nights from 2003 to 2019. With a fixed 1 m/s nightly noise floor, a calcium term retains 97.36% to 100.00% of the signal information relative to a cubic time fit with four planet terms. Four activity indices retain 93.03% to 96.69%. Exact matrix bounds cover all phases. The simultaneous fitted amplitudes are 0.300 and 0.224 m/s. The reported candidate amplitude was 0.95 m/s. On 259 common nights, a second public SERVAL reduction gives 0.201 and 0.091 m/s with the same dates, weights, and activity values. The CCF scan still has a model-dependent peak near 206 days. Early and late fixed-period coefficients differ. We preserve source data, provenance, code, figures, numerical checks, and offline repeat steps. The bounds apply to the stated fixed activity terms and weights. Conditional errors do not include a full stellar-noise model. Neither reduction is the original red-spectrum HARPS-TERRA series. These results do not rule out HD 40307 g.

HD 40307 · HARPS · HARPS RVBank · radial velocity · stellar activity · planet candidate · signal information · linear projection · reproducible research

Admitted 4 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220268

    This paper gives the candidate period and reported amplitude that define our fixed-period test.

  2. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526729

    This paper supplies the four nuisance periods and documents the uncertain signal near 205 days.

  3. usesA six-index linear activity fit reduces 42.38-day signals at all phases in the published HD 26965 NEID data sci:sha256:9270d06a9645dd96e612802402610e8a5cc3419530c0d62ec76525f44a17c4b6

    We use its exact projection, generalized eigenvalue, and amplitude transfer method with new code and a different star sample.

  4. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2261

    This paper discusses projection against activity measurements and the limits of separate fits.

  5. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936686

    We use the public HARPS RVBank SERVAL velocities, errors, flags, and source metadata.

  6. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348263

    This paper describes the updated HARPS RVBank data used for the matched comparison.

Cited by

4 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.