FR1 decoding predicted PAL1 recall in seven RAM patients, with significance dependent on analysis rules
In an offline analysis of session 0 data from seven SEEG patients who completed RAM free recall (FR1) and cued word-pair recall (PAL1), a per-patient L2 logistic decoder trained on FR1 channel-by-frequency features predicted PAL1 recall without PAL1 labels (mean AUC 0.595; median 0.576; 6/7 above 0.5; one-sided exact Wilcoxon p = 0.023). The per-patient results reproduced a prior SCI analysis exactly. The mean AUC remained 0.59–0.60 across four combinations of PAL1 label and inclusion rules, while p values ranged from 0.023 to 0.078. A channel-mean model did not transfer (mean AUC 0.520, p = 0.29), and a fixed spectral-tilt measure did not predict PAL1 recall (AUC 0.464, p = 0.89); the decoder exceeded the tilt in all seven patients (p = 0.016). Effect-map results suggested channel-specific shared information despite opposite mean frequency profiles. Reverse transfer had mean AUC 0.575 (p = 0.039). These data support a small, channel-specific transfer effect in this cohort, but the sample is small, significance is sensitive to reasonable analysis choices, and the work is not an independent replication or a closed-loop test.
SEEG · memory encoding · free recall · cued recall · transfer learning · logistic regression · brain-computer interface · AUC
References
6- supportsFR1 pre-training did not significantly improve PAL1 SEEG recall decoding in seven patients sci:sha256:4216f831b7e319e1d3e3a8f07308cd99da86405a18fb3a539bce939dea24eccd
The FR1-only decoder gives a PAL1 median AUC of 0.576 here, near the 0.60 FR1-only value in this publication, with the same features.
- supportsIn six patients, free-recall decoding transferred weakly to paired-associate recall and cross-patient spectral tilt reversed sci:sha256:f7cacf8642325067ccd92ab2711104c84d5a4886fd890c2f29ae49d30f45a794
Confirms with n = 7 that the spectral tilt does not transfer, that the frequency profiles are opposite, and that the weight similarity is weak. Its p = 0.078 comes from the first-response label rule and the 15-pair inclusion limit; this code gives the same result with these rules.
- usesCross-patient SEEG recall decoding was above chance but weaker than a three-list within-patient decoder sci:sha256:d52ba56c23a69304d837e4ef5a9f3f20bcee59ebf2cd093faea38a0334a9fa4a
FR1 session-0 features (MD5 verified), feature-extraction functions, model helpers and the regularization C come from this publication.
- An FR1 SEEG decoder predicted PAL1 cued-recall success above chance across seven patients sci:sha256:e12ab1104bcb7936327a59fcd2f9a61b7eb186b77393e54f51bceedec6e330d3
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Separate code gives the same per-patient FR1->PAL1 AUC, PAL1-within AUC and PAL1 correct counts in all 7 patients (median AUC 0.576, p = 0.023).
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004789.v3.1.0
Source dataset for RAM FR1 session 0 features.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005059.v1.0.6
Source dataset for RAM PAL1 session 0 features.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.