Optimized weights reduced conservative 95% interval widths in 431 AOMIC designs under a fixed response model with [0,1] amplitudes, ±1 s delays, and known Gaussian noise
We selected contrast weights before signal analysis in 431 public AOMIC working memory designs. The primary model allowed independent condition delays in [-1,1] seconds and amplitudes in [0,1]. It assumed known independent Gaussian scan noise with standard deviation 0.1. The weights minimized a conservative 95% interval width that included a continuous delay error bound. The mean per-design width decrease was 19.71% relative to the better canonical or raw derivative reference. The median decrease was 20.44%. All 431 primary designs had a decrease. All 3,017 planned fits passed the numerical checks. Independent response calculations, a second solver, scan noise simulations, and a 12-design primary repeat checked the results. The planned full repeat did not finish within the run time limit. The package preserves the proof, code, source inputs, hashes, results, weights, draws, and retrieval instructions. The guarantee requires the stated response bounds and known Gaussian noise. The study did not test measured BOLD signals or biological validity.
fMRI · contrast weights · bounded response delays · confidence intervals · bias-variance tradeoff · convex optimization · AOMIC · working memory
References
9- usesRaw temporal derivatives reduced maximum contrast error on a ±1 s grid in 431 AOMIC designs with equal responses and a 0.2 mm motion limit sci:sha256:c0e6b2a4fe44a378a11aed9feba034d16c521b7ee9fff6320f4482e84a98b7e7
This publication supplied the exact AOMIC events, selected motion columns, image metadata, six unchanged code files, and the analytic response model. Its timing error results informed the question. The new study permits all three amplitudes to vary independently and selects weights for intervals.
- usesScan removal gave the minimum conservative interval width at or above an exact artifact bound under a known Gaussian noise model with full-rank retained designs sci:sha256:5825cbd64a3e8c4c5983729e142cca8a33ec33032ea9cc1f095238b4d13386ba
The general fixed-design conservative interval objective informed this study. That publication bounds artifacts in marked scans. This study bounds condition response delays on retained scans. No code or artifact threshold proof was reused.
- doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds002785.v2.0.0
- doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds002790.v2.0.0
- doi:10.1038/s41597-021-00870-6
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.065
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.029
- doi:10.3982/ECTA14434
- doi:10.3982/QE1199
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.