With a 20 ms minimum time constant, a 125 ms Mi4 current delay reversed 4 Hz direction contrast in 9 of 13 selected T4 units in nine periodic fly visual models
We tested whether changing Mi4 input is needed for motion selectivity in released fly visual models. The main set had 13 selected T4a and T4b units in nine of the ten models with the lowest task loss. We used 4 Hz gratings, periodic boundaries, a 20 ms minimum time constant and 2.5 ms steps. Replaying the intact gray current preserved the complete gray response. It reduced mean direction contrast from 0.417 to 0.056. A constant replay kept each target's intact mean current for each direction. It gave mean contrast 0.071. Each replay kept contrast at or above 0.10 in only 2 of 13 units. A later test replayed a repeating Mi4 current waveform. A delay changed its timing while keeping its mean and value distribution fixed. Zero delay kept the threshold in all 13 units. A 125 ms delay reversed the intact direction order in nine units. A 187.5 ms delay reversed it in eleven. A half-size time step kept both reversal counts. Full finite-eye runs also kept only two units above threshold under gray or constant mean replay. In all 50 models, 26 of 54 selected units reversed after the 125 ms delay. Exact self-replay, source reconstruction, independent edge sums and selected new integrations checked the method. The result supports a timing role for this pathway under the stated model probe. It does not establish Mi4 function in animals. The package has source archives, code, all traces, results, figures, source hashes and repeat instructions.
connectome · Drosophila · visual motion · Mi4 · T4 · current replay · direction selectivity · causal model
References
5- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-024-07939-3
We use flyvis 1.2.0 and all 50 released flow/0000 parameter sets. The current replay test also checks the source timing hypothesis under a grating probe.
- usesAt a 20 ms time constant floor, removal of same-type T4 excitation reduced gain but kept 4 Hz direction selectivity in 13 units of nine fly visual models sci:sha256:9e1b2df72b566b64fef2163b1d1935900db2d6bce7964c0992ba035014588047
We use its verified source reader, graph reduction, intact selection rule and numerical table. We add gray, mean and phase current replay.
- At a fixed 20 ms time constant floor, 5 ms and 20 ms Euler steps gave a median 42.1% central flash response difference in 50 released fly visual models sci:sha256:6599234b9550c5bf4ecb3001d49f70fd120dc3bcba80a92bab738a8461a7ad15
Its solver test motivates the fixed 20 ms time constant floor and the smaller-step control.
- doi:10.7554/eLife.24394
This work gives the anatomical context for T4 input placement.
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.075
This experimental study provides context for the role of excitatory and inhibitory input timing in motion tuning.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.