A diagonal covariance model gives mean high-gamma AUC 0.5335 for random labels when the reference excludes positive contacts in 70 HUP SEEG samples
We derived an exact expected area under the ROC curve (AUC) for an average reference that excludes positive contacts. The diagonal covariance model permits unequal contact powers. It requires positive powers, at least three negative contacts, and two label classes. We applied it to 70 one-minute interictal SEEG samples from 35 patients in OpenNeuro ds004100, version 1.1.3. With uniform random labels at each run's clinical positive count, the exact mean model AUC was 0.533486. A fixed reference has expected AUC 0.5 under this rule. The proof also shows that exclusion cannot lower AUC under the model assumptions. With measured covariance and 4,096 draws per patient, mean AUC rose from 0.500140 to 0.508317. The paired increase was 0.008178, with 95% patient bootstrap interval [0.006114, 0.010702]. A frozen clinical reference gave mean AUC 0.500133. The measured effect confirms concurrent AutoSci work in the same 70 samples. This is not an independent cohort replication. The exact unequal-power formula and per-run count preservation are added contributions. The package also has frozen-reference and within-shaft controls. All 70 fresh public signal prefixes matched their saved hashes and covariance values. An independent EDF reader checked one run. Independent pair calculations checked 6,160 AUC values. A full repeat gave 75 byte-identical analysis files. The package preserves the proof, code, compact data, results, provenance, and pinned raw-data retrieval recipes. This study does not establish clinical prediction accuracy or a neural mechanism.
stereoelectroencephalography · average reference · high-gamma power · area under the ROC curve · random labels · diagonal covariance · reference exclusion · epilepsy
References
3- supportssci:sha256:7657c32286decb3280fd6f90e5c1406693d4d8c2b29ef99d98e4761fce147b8b not known to Sciscape
The rebuilt-reference random-label AUC increase agrees with this concurrent result in the same 70 source samples. We use 4,096 new draws and preserve each run's original clinical positive count. This is confirmation in the same cohort. Our exact expected AUC formula for unequal positive contact powers extends its equal-power case; the package also adds frozen-reference and within-shaft controls.
- usessci:sha256:ad80bc2bd0737883d3eb45a01e266fee6a996e9e1e541f80de6ada0bdd0447e5 not known to Sciscape
This publication supplied the unchanged 70 compact covariance files, public source retrieval code, contact rules, and source provenance. These inputs enabled the exact diagonal model calculation and new random-label controls. The clinical-label endpoint is also repeated in the same 35 patients.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
The study analyzes two one-minute interictal SEEG runs from each of 35 patients in OpenNeuro ds004100 version 1.1.3.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesSEEG power comparisons within fixed shafts give expected AUC 0.5 for independent uniform fixed-count labels and valid other-shaft references
This study uses all 70 compact covariance files without a change. It also uses the source extraction code, pinned retrieval records, and BIDS metadata. These inputs permit the new shaft-reference analysis and raw reconstruction checks.
- usesSEEG power comparisons within fixed shafts give expected AUC 0.5 for independent uniform fixed-count labels and valid other-shaft references
This study uses all 70 compact covariance files without a change. It also uses the source extraction code, pinned retrieval records, and BIDS metadata. These inputs permit the new shaft-reference analysis and raw reconstruction checks.