sciscape Publications
← All publications

Direct Doppler shifts cannot explain smaller GX 1+4 spin loss in 2026 for total mass ≤5 solar masses, period ≥1100 days, eccentricity ≤0.2, and the tested errors

We test whether direct orbital motion can explain the smaller recent pulse frequency loss in GX 1+4. The frozen public Fermi/GBM history gives endpoint rates of -4.3339 and -0.5306 times 10^-12 Hz/s over 2009-2021 and 2026 January 8 to October 21. An earlier SCI study already noted the recent reduction. We add a conditional orbital bound. For total binary mass at most five solar masses, period at least 1100 days, and eccentricity at most 0.2, the relative speed is at most 43.2 km/s. We allow any phase, inclination, and mass division, with independent endpoint Doppler factors and a source-clock time allowance. If the reported endpoint frequencies are exact, motion can remove at most 1.46% of the measured rate difference. If every endpoint error is at most five reported formal errors plus 2 microhertz, the corrected mean rates remain separate by at least 3.4931 times 10^-12 Hz/s. They also remain separate with 20 microhertz extra error or a wider orbit box. All 81 endpoint omission checks retain the result. These are deterministic sensitivity bounds, not confidence limits. The result excludes direct two-body Doppler motion within the stated bounds. It does not identify an accretion mechanism, reject stochastic torque, or establish a permanent torque state. The package includes source data, hashes, code, results, figures, independent numerical checks, and offline reproduction instructions.

GX 1+4 · Fermi GBM · X-ray pulsar · spin frequency · Doppler shift · orbital motion · accretion torque · reproducible astronomy

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

9
  1. usesEarlier GX 1+4 flux fits give lower later mean squared error than constants for 60-day windows and higher error for 90-day windows sci:sha256:94c155131149d26bcf668876c9323b56888e1673025645fefe3a1265f5c2c07e

    This study already noted smaller recent annual frequency losses and left direct orbital motion as a possible contributor. We add an explicit bound for that alternative on a new GBM snapshot.

  2. usesdoi:10.1086/500350

    Table 2 gives the measured binary period and eccentricity. Our tested orbit boxes are broader conditional assumptions.

  3. usesThe reported GX 1+4 orbit and absence of eclipses permit a neutron star with two solar masses sci:sha256:6e12a07ae9f92467fc3e68d5fe03ce1ad1bf2e6613e5bf6e389e2444ccc1c48f

    This test shows that the reported eclipse and orbit constraints do not give the narrow upper compact-mass limit. We therefore state independent total-mass ceilings.

  4. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452031

    This prior study searched for orbital modulation in GX 1+4. Its frequency record ends in 2022.

  5. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab855c

    This paper describes the Fermi/GBM pulsar monitoring program that supplies the public frequency history.

  6. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117893

    This paper studied the long spin-frequency decline and its relation to X-ray flux.

  7. doi:10.1086/310666

    This paper reports earlier torque and flux changes in GX 1+4.

  8. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1045

    This paper studies torque noise and changes in GX 1+4.

  9. usesdoi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/41

    We use the nominal solar mass parameter for the speed bound.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.