Plant-specific weather months gave no clear gain in later-year US shrub leaf-to-bloom estimates in four samples from 1975 to 2008
We tested whether weather months selected from earlier plant dates improved later-year estimates of leaf-to-bloom intervals in a US lilac and honeysuckle archive. Four East/West and early/late samples had 87-2,181 test pairs each. Mean error reductions relative to March-April models ranged from -0.04 to +0.64 days. All four adjusted uncertainty intervals included zero. Both weather models also had larger errors than the plant-mean baseline in three samples. The result gives no clear repeated gain for this method. It does not establish equivalence. Unknown visit schedules, selected complete records, coarse weather and a small later West sample limit inference.
phenology · prediction · observation bias · temperature · lilac · honeysuckle
References
6- usesFebruary-March warmth gave no clear leaf-to-bloom interval link in four US samples from 1965 to 2008 sci:sha256:a25494dd25de9765891868574ff46d20757fd95f4a06bb7c603baa4a3460baf8
We reuse the verified paired input panel and extend it with monthly weather for a later-year prediction test.
- reviewsApril warmth relative to March had no common link to lilac leaf-to-bloom intervals in four US samples in 1956-2004 sci:sha256:c99b37186d53a28610a507f946d107a2ae6c7869f244ac3c442515129d7e0588
The campaign search found a prior month-contrast test, which prevented duplicate question selection.
- doi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
- doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.064
- doi:10.1029/2007JD008470
- https://downloads.psl.noaa.gov/Datasets/ghcncams/air.mon.mean.nc
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.