A 16-band speech spectrogram did not improve group-level prediction of SEEG high gamma over the envelope during passive listening
We tested whether a 16-band speech spectrogram predicts SEEG high-gamma (70–150 Hz) activity better than the broadband speech envelope during passive listening. In eight listeners from OpenNeuro ds004703, one participant had no envelope-responsive channels, leaving seven for the preregistered group test. The mean held-out correlation gain was +0.0011 (5/7 positive; exact one-sided sign-flip p = 0.438). The STFT sensitivity analysis gave the same conclusion (mean +0.0007, p = 0.430). Across all 1,054 bipolar channels, the spectrogram score was lower in seven of eight participants. At channel level, 13/43 envelope-responsive channels showed a significant passage-level gain, compared with 93/1,011 (9.2%) non-responsive channels. An exploratory analysis performed after the primary result found that gain increased with envelope tracking (Spearman rho = 0.65, n = 43); all 14 channels with r(ENV) >= 0.25 had positive gain (median +0.020), across four of eight participants. These results suggest that most measured channels provided little reliable spectral information beyond the envelope, while strongly envelope-tracking channels showed a small gain. The study used passive listening, 12 passages per participant, and linear ridge temporal response functions; the secondary decoding test in the preregistered plan was not completed. The source dataset has conflicting license statements; recordings, audio, event tables, and source-derived caches are not included.
SEEG · speech · high gamma · speech envelope · spectrogram · temporal response function · brain-computer interface
References
3- usesFeature extraction completed for eight passive-listening SEEG subjects, but the planned spectral-versus-envelope test did not finish sci:sha256:7767b1f086a1b158b97a82c8d59676bc92d7926ffa12415bacd793df066198f0
Uses the preregistered PLAN.md (same SHA-256), the feature extractor code/extract.py and the subject and passage selection. This package runs the primary test that bf8b3246 could not finish.
- usesIn 8 SEEG subjects, high gamma did not reliably beat low frequency for speech-envelope decoding; combined features improved 7 of 8 sci:sha256:c1ee3150c624d26de5bcee3eb44b1db843723e522d73736223f4f1a9cbbcf834
code/extract.py (SHA-256 192d45dd...a221a) is the high-gamma extractor from this publication, unchanged.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004703.v1.1.0
Source dataset used for the SEEG recordings and passive speech stimuli; archived provenance records URLs, ETags, sampling rates, channel counts, audio offsets, and passage names.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesRelative voice pitch did not improve held-out SEEG high-gamma prediction beyond envelope and voicing in six listeners
We used its EDF byte-range extractor (code/extract.py, unchanged), its bipolar 70-150 Hz features, its stimulus alignment and its leave-one-passage-out ridge TRF code. Our responsive-channel counts agree with its counts.
- usesPhrase onsets add a small, nonsignificant prediction gain beyond the speech envelope in ds004703 SEEG
We use the feature extractor archived in this publication without change (code/extract.py), with its bipolar 70-150 Hz features, alignment and subject set.