Long secondary periods of 2,877 LMC red giants lose phase between OGLE 1997-2009 and Gaia DR3 2014-2017, while short-period ellipsoidal binaries keep phase
Question: does the long secondary period (LSP) of LMC red giants keep a constant phase over two decades, as a light change locked to a binary orbit must do? Approach: for 2,877 OGLE-III LSP stars we fitted the OGLE-II/III I-band light curves (1997-2009), predicted the LSP phase at the middle of the Gaia DR3 epoch photometry (2014-2017), and measured the Gaia G phase at the same period. For each star we injected a strictly periodic signal into the same data to get the measurement noise. Red-giant ellipsoidal binaries from the same catalogue and the pulsation periods of the LSP stars are controls. Results: the median absolute LSP phase offset is 0.121 cycles against a median null SD of 0.053 cycles; 52% of the stars exceed the strictly periodic null at p <= 0.05. A random-walk phase model gives an effective diffusion D = 0.0045 cycles^2 per cycle (95% CI 0.0043-0.0048), which light-curve injections convert to an intrinsic D of about 0.003. Ellipsoidal binaries with periods below 200 d keep phase over a median of 19 cycles (D = 3e-5, upper limit 7e-5), and all ellipsoidal stars at Gaia S/N >= 10 give D <= 1e-4. A same-band test inside the OGLE data gives LSP D = 0.0043 for 4,953 stars and D = 0 for 444 ellipsoidal stars. The early and later drifts are not correlated, so the data agree with a stochastic phase wander, not a constant period change. Pulsation periods keep no phase memory. Conclusion: in this scope the photometric LSP is not a strict clock; a binary model needs obscuring material that moves in orbital longitude. Limitations: different bands (I against G), sparse Gaia sampling (median 36 epochs), a null that is somewhat optimistic for faint signals, LMC only, and no radial-velocity test.
long secondary period · red giants · Large Magellanic Cloud · OGLE · Gaia DR3 · phase coherence · binary hypothesis · ellipsoidal variables · period stability · variable stars
References
10- useshttps://arxiv.org/abs/0910.1354
OGLE-III LMC long-period variable catalogue and photometry (Soszynski et al. 2009, Acta Astron. 59, 239).
- challengesdoi:10.3847/2041-8213/abf3c9
Binary/dusty-cloud explanation of LSPs; a strictly orbital clock is not consistent with the measured phase wander unless the cloud moves in longitude.
- supportsdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.09767
Gaia astrometry disfavors a binary origin of LSPs; our photometric phase test points the same way with different data.
- https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0701463
Soszynski 2007, LSPs and binarity in red giants (ellipsoidal-like LSP light curves).
- doi:10.1086/382123
Wood, Olivier and Kawaler 2004, origin of LSPs.
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2311.04314
Pawlak et al. 2024, LSPs in ASAS-SN and Gaia.
- usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940
Gaia DR3 summary paper; gaia_source and epoch photometry used.
- usesdoi:10.17876/gaia/dr.3/55
Gaia DR3 epoch photometry at the AIP mirror.
- usesGaia DR3 and ZTF timing of 11,668 Mira-like stars (2014-2025) shows a weak persistent period-change signal and no confirmed rapid period change; a simple O-C extrapolation test is biased sci:sha256:daf0fd31dd887ab0209168a4aeffffffbcb57097f0d0cddc560cdff4cbfc0804
Lesson that phase-persistence tests need light-curve-level nulls; AIP epoch-photometry recipe.
- Periods of 727 ASAS-3 Mira variables changed by 1.1 percent rms from 2000-2009 to 2013-2025 as random wander; early trends did not continue, and only NSV 08001 exceeded the wander sci:sha256:ac75c21920efbdcbf9253a485112a856d1469117a43383299ff3cdf30c5d9f92
Related campaign study of Mira period wander.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.