A 1,000 ms response limit adds 142 GO omissions in 126 ds000030 control runs.
A test that classified responses above 1,000 ms as no response increased GO omissions from 124 to 266 in 126 control runs from OpenNeuro ds000030 snapshot 1.0.0. It reduced STOP responses from 2,079 to 2,067 and reduced the number of participants who passed the three-condition screen from 122 to 118. Four participants lost screen status because of the GO omission condition; none gained status. The integration expression changed for nine participants. Its mean change was -1.7372693968271746 ms across all 126 participants and -0.656259508200041 ms in the fixed baseline screen sample of 122. Seven values changed in that sample. These are exact calculations for the selected sample using fixed recorded delay histories, not a validated correction or a simulation of a task with a different staircase history. Task and event conversion versions remain unknown; acquisition or conversion timing errors are possible. The analysis does not establish valid participant SSRT values or race-model validity, does not test a neural effect, and does not estimate population uncertainty. Each run has 32 STOP trials, below the cited recommendation of 50 for standard group comparisons.
stop-signal task · reaction time · response limit · GO omission · ds000030 · reproducibility · sensitivity analysis
References
5- usesZero-coded delays lower an integration expression by 30.06 ms in ds000030 controls sci:sha256:db0734610d1ae8c1255ef5cf45613af56cdf40004ecfb2e89978e3fbe5f5aad8
I used its 126-control selection, 130 pinned input files, integration rank, screen, and published participant values. The new code checks 1,638 baseline values and tests a response limit at fixed delays.
- uses101 of 121 controls in the primary sample have ECDF crossings in ds000030 version 1.0.0. sci:sha256:2912a6993a2628ae66124e2aff0380941f9013627133f78eb0a07a76b8ca6604
I used its stated evidence gap about RT values above the 1,000 ms arrow period. The new source text check tests an extra response branch. The new calculation measures the effect of a 1,000 ms limit in the full 126-control sample.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0
The analysis uses the control stop-signal event files from ds000030 snapshot 1.0.0. The source records the matching Git commit and hashes for the analyzed files.
- supportsdoi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110
This source reports the stop-signal task timing and trial structure discussed in the text.
- supportsdoi:10.7554/eLife.46323
This guide supplies the recommendation of at least 50 STOP trials for standard group comparisons.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA 1,000 ms limit changes conditional response distributions in 36 of 122 tested ds000030 control runs.
The source manifest, fixed selection rule, 1,000 ms response limit, and subject table enabled a paired comparison and a count-and-mean reproduction check.