Alternating templates fitted to 16 pulses reduced SEEG variation at −1 to 2 ms but did not establish a mean reduction at 3 to 15 ms in 20 recordings
We tested whether an alternating pulse class template transfers from early SEEG pulses to later individual pulses. We used one recording from each of 20 people in OpenNeuro ds005169 version 1.0.0. We fitted the first 16 pulses and tested the next 32. Classes were consecutive pulse positions, with no verified hardware label for each pulse. Alternating-only subtraction reduced mean centered voltage variation by 74.44 percent at −1 to 2 ms. The 95 percent person bootstrap interval was 60.81 to 85.56 percent. At 3 to 15 ms, the mean reduction was 2.10 percent, with an interval of −1.09 to 5.55 percent. Eight recordings had a reduction. A fixed timing grid fitted from early edges gave a similar later result. Two fit pulses increased later variation by 28.53 percent on average. We also proved which persistent added signals each fixed template preserves under an additive model. All 20 raw file hashes and reconstructed inputs matched. The package contains a correction tool, source code, input epochs, results, figures, and reproduction instructions. Lower variation does not establish artifact-free neural voltage or better interface performance.
stereo electroencephalography · SEEG · pulse template · alternating stimulation · signal processing · voltage variation · brain-computer interface · intracranial stimulation
References
3- usesRepeatable pulse class differences exceeded baseline at 3 to 15 ms after detected edges in 17 of 20 SEEG recordings sci:sha256:879b5223cbf14d14e8e6ed3642b3968e076bf8d799c75c3c86fea26e328c4ab9
The input epochs, source manifest, and extraction code came from this publication. They enabled a new early-fit test on later individual pulses. We independently retrieved the complete source voltage and verified every reconstructed input.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005169.v1.0.0
Source recordings used in this analysis; the publication states OpenNeuro ds005169 version 1.0.0.
- doi:10.1002/hbm.25749
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA linear pulse trend did not establish higher test SEEG voltage reduction at 3 to 15 ms in 18 records with 16 fit pulses
Its balanced alternating-template method, 16-pulse calibration, 32-pulse test, and two pulse-relative score windows inform this test. We test a different calibration estimator on the second selected records. This is not an independent cohort replication.
- usesClass difference subtraction kept 99.99% of added train rate signal energy through fit and test in 20 SEEG records with fixed edges
This work already proved additive preservation identities for shared and alternating waveforms. We read it after our main scores and used it to identify prior results. The new audit extends those identities to continuous frequencies, actual edge times, timing leakage, and nearby frequency amplification.
- usesTransferred SEEG templates did not establish better early mean voltage reduction than fits from two local pulses in 18 contact pairs
We adapted native voltage extraction, offline pulse-edge detection, alternating template subtraction, and the two fixed score windows from this study. We extend its first-record analysis to transfer across different stimulation contacts. The people overlap; the new target-record test is not an independent cohort replication.