At fixed cell noise power, 1% noise shared within eye modules cut information about a slow mode by 35.5% in two mean outputs of one zebrafish linear model
We tested how shared input noise changes a slow memory signal in a fixed model of one larval zebrafish circuit. The model had 289 core cells and 54 output cells. We kept the circuit weights, cell times and each core input noise power fixed. A fraction 0.01 of the standardized input noise variance was common within each of two released eye modules. The two common inputs were independent. We calculated Gaussian Fisher information about one slow mode amplitude from the mean rates of 32 motor and 22 internuclear output cells. Information fell by 35.5% relative to independent input. The exact variance of the best scalar estimate rose by 55.0%. Mean activity and its 10.10 s decay stayed fixed. The exact slow coordinate gave a similar loss of 35.1%. Noise timing and cell-time checks retained a loss. Observation of all core rates gave a 33.2% loss. Shuffled module labels also gave losses of 30.0% to 32.3%. Thus the exact eye groups explain only part of the effect. All 19 main numerical checks passed. A fresh-source repeat matched the stored numerical results. We supply code, source hashes, covariances, output kernels, figures and a query tool. These results concern a linear Gaussian model and a specified observation task. The shared noise fraction is an assumption, not a measured value. We do not estimate animal memory capacity or eye-angle error.
connectome · zebrafish · neural integrator · shared input noise · Fisher information · memory precision · linear model · output covariance
References
6- usesdoi:10.1038/s41593-024-01784-3
We use the pinned source contact counts, cell classes, input counts and module labels to build the model.
- usesOpposite 25% module gain changes reversed slow mode output bias in one zebrafish linear model with a fixed 10 s decay sci:sha256:c1f5e7dce0cde2b1b727bb283a1a9a7722c3468c0b0dc8f5469cecda9abbc219
We retain its 343-cell panel and the two output groups. We test noise covariance with fixed mean dynamics.
- supportsTwo models of one zebrafish connectome had different stability under nominal 10% gain CV with fixed mean gain and initial 10 s leading decay sci:sha256:daae49ace6fff49295ee19f81507fb70a3ea25dadd4bc202ba32d01c0fc423a1
Its source-scale baseline checks the model panel and leading decay. Our noise test differs from its gain tests.
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0804451105
This prior work defines Fisher memory measures for noisy dynamical networks.
- doi:10.1073/pnas.1117386109
This prior work links neural noise to the precision of persistent memory.
- doi:10.1038/nn.3807
This prior work shows why the pattern of noise correlation can limit information.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsShared gain noise reduced the variance stability limit by a factor of 25 in one zebrafish Itô integrator model
This earlier additive-noise test establishes related precision sensitivity in the same model. The present test concerns activity-dependent gain noise and second-moment stability.
- usesWith known dynamics, two added core rates made four noise powers identifiable in one zebrafish linear model with unknown recording variances
We use its fixed 343-cell model family, noise basis, source receipt, and computed covariance for a numerical check. We study identification of the noise powers.