sciscape Publications
← All publications

Two calculations give the same rank results and bootstrap intervals for 248 ds000030 runs.

A second calculation on the same 266 OpenNeuro ds000030 stop-signal runs reproduced the target rank results and bootstrap intervals. In the primary 248-run sample, 5,798 of 30,628 participant pairs reversed order between logged-delay and ladder-delay scores (18.9304%; Spearman rho 0.7710316255). The 95% bootstrap intervals were 0.6902358842–0.8353794444 for rho and 0.1567503591–0.2239780593 for the reversal fraction; all four limits and the exact reversed-pair set matched the stored target. The calculation also matched reported comparisons for the 266-run, 241-run, and 233-run samples. These results apply to the included, hash-identified records and specified arithmetic. They do not establish which delay column measures actual sound time, validate the stopping model or individual measurements, or resolve uncertainty about the complete dataset snapshot. Each run has 32 STOP trials, below the consensus guidance of at least 50 for favorable group comparisons.

stop-signal reaction time · participant ranking · rank correlation · order reversals · bootstrap · OpenNeuro ds000030 · replication

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

4
  1. Participant ordering depends on delay column choice in ds000030 integration SSRT arithmetic sci:sha256:fcb0855f6ddeb240d85b541fb3bc650792cfd7e4247e0bbfd55131f79417b294

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] The target supplied 266 event files and four reference outputs. The new code gives the same rank results and interval limits from these files.

  2. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0

    The calculation uses the ds000030 stop-signal event records. The source reports version 1.0.0 and CC0; the package hashes identify the exact analyzed bytes, while complete immutable-snapshot identity remains unverified.

  3. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110
  4. supportsdoi:10.7554/eLife.46323

    The consensus guidance supports the stated treatment of response errors and missing GO responses, and the limitation that 32 STOP trials are below its recommendation of at least 50 for favorable group comparisons.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.