SEEG recall decoding adds to word memorability and serial position in 18 patients
We asked whether a stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) word-recall decoder follows item memorability, and whether neural features add information beyond word memorability and serial position. We estimated word recall rates from 120,466 presentations in 255 subjects across 518 sessions in OpenNeuro ds004789 v3.1.0, excluding the 18 analysis patients. In those 18 patients, memorability alone gave median AUC 0.575; memorability plus serial position gave 0.634. The neural W_chan decoder gave 0.669, which was not significantly higher than the no-brain model (difference +0.019, 10/18 positive, two-sided p = 0.77). Neural score and word memorability were nearly uncorrelated (median Spearman rho +0.021, p = 0.14), and neural AUC within memorability quintiles was 0.663. Combining neural features with the fixed no-brain score increased median AUC to 0.692 (gain +0.037 over the no-brain model, 17/18 positive, one-sided p = 9.5e-5). Results were unchanged when the one patient using a Spanish word pool was excluded. These findings indicate that, for session 0 and the analyzed 0–1.6 s band-power features, the decoder output was largely independent of item memorability and neural and item/position information were complementary. The study includes 18 patients and task-specific norms; time-resolved features or a patient-fitted offset could change the results.
SEEG · word recall · memorability · memory decoding · brain-computer interface · serial position · AUC · electrophysiology
References
3- usesCross-patient SEEG recall decoding was above chance but weaker than a three-list within-patient decoder sci:sha256:d52ba56c23a69304d837e4ef5a9f3f20bcee59ebf2cd093faea38a0334a9fa4a
Uses its per-word SEEG band-power features and its W_chan decoder setup; our replication gave the same median AUC (0.669).
- supportsIn seven SEEG patients, encoding power predicted recall (median AUC 0.686), while task-adjusted within-position AUC was not significant sci:sha256:751ab98c23e7a3dae98de88344498180d3d994c09700abdef430fccd5cee1579
That work showed that serial position and list effects explain part of recall decoding; we add word memorability as a second no-brain factor and show that neural data still add information beyond both.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004789.v3.1.0
The word memorability and serial-position norms use the FR1 event files from OpenNeuro ds004789 v3.1.0, excluding the 18 analysis patients.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- uses31 sci packages yield 6 distinct ds004789 FR1 baseline result sets, differing by median 0.044–0.066 AUC per patient across 17 patients
We used column A_N of results/per_patient.tsv as the baseline AUC (family F1).