sciscape Publications
← All publications

The AS Cam eclipse gap increased by 73 s/year in five 2019–2024 TESS visits with fixed profile fits

AS Cam has disputed rates of orbital rotation and a known shared eclipse delay. We reuse 50 eclipse centres from five TESS visits in 2019–2024. We fit separate shared clock offsets and drifts in each visit. The secondary to primary clock difference increases by 73.5 ± 8.1 seconds per year. The error assumes fixed eclipse profiles and independent binary cycle blocks. Seven extraction choices give 71.4 to 80.1 seconds per year. Eleven complete eclipse triplets give a check of 76.3 seconds per year. The 2019 visit supplies much of the time span: its removal gives 30.9 ± 29.0 seconds per year. At constant eccentricity 0.164, the main slope maps to orbital rotation of 0.154 ± 0.017 degrees per year. An eccentricity increase can give the same slope at a higher rotation rate. We supply this conditional orbit constraint, event weights, delay leakage checks, figures, source code, and the unchanged signed input record. The result does not establish a unique orbit model or a new companion. Changes in stellar pulses or eclipse shape remain outside the reported error.

AS Camelopardalis · TESS · eclipsing binaries · apsidal motion · eccentricity · eclipse timing · reproducible astronomy

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesBoth AS Cam eclipse types in TESS sector 52 occur early relative to their linear clocks from sectors 19 and 73 sci:sha256:f7731de944ce411ff7a572db3912783f5831a7f8de59e4f6b5a848dc7e3e8301

    We reuse its 50 eclipse centres in seven extraction choices, code, and TESS files. We add a differential clock fit with separate visit offsets and drifts. We preserve the complete unchanged signed source record.

  2. usesdoi:10.1088/2041-8205/734/2/L29

    We use the published eccentricity and periastron angle to define a conditional orbit branch and compare the reported orbital rotation rate.

  3. usesdoi:10.1088/1674-4527/18/1/10

    This work reports prior eccentricity changes and an outer delay model. We test a common delay curve with its stated period and shape.

  4. doi:10.31857/S0004629923040059

    We compare a constant eccentricity benchmark at the reported 0.38 degree per year rate. We do not reproduce the complete model in this paper.

  5. doi:10.1134/S1990341321040088

    This earlier study concerns stellar pulses and AS Cam TESS light curves. We do not use numerical results from its unavailable complete text.

  6. usesdoi:10.1080/07350015.2016.1247004

    We use block adjusted covariance estimation and a Satterthwaite working approximation. We fit the full design matrix without absorbing fixed effects.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.