After large mapped fires, open-land bird counts increased by about 10% and total counts did not change on 103 US Breeding Bird Survey routes (mostly western), 1986-2025
Question: do bird counts on Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) routes change after a large fire burns part of the route, and does the change depend on habitat guild? Approach: we joined 31,514 MTBS fire perimeters to 3,152 US BBS route paths. A route was burned when fire covered at least 20% of a 500 m route buffer in one bird-year after 5 years with no mapped fire. 103 burned routes (84 in the West, 96% wildfire area) were compared with 1,772 unburned routes in the same Bird Conservation Region. We used a stacked before-after-control model with observer-on-route and region-year fixed effects. The plan was written before we fit outcome models. Results: in post-fire years 1-5, open-land species (AVONET habitat density 3, not waterbirds) increased by 0.102 log units (95% CI 0.037 to 0.166; placebo p = 0.01). The increase repeated in fire cohorts of 1986-2004 (+0.131) and 2005-2022 (+0.093). It became larger with burned fraction (+0.070 at 10%, +0.186 at 50%). Total counts (-0.001, CI -0.052 to 0.049) and species richness did not change. The within-survey open-minus-closed contrast was +0.145 (CI 0.010 to 0.281; no pre-trend). Woodpeckers (+0.069) and closed-habitat species (-0.044) had CIs that included zero. Closed-habitat loss was clear only in early cohorts and at 50% burned. Lazuli Bunting (+0.34) and Mourning Dove (+0.27) increased most. Golden-crowned Kinglet and Warbling Vireo (-0.20) decreased most. Limitations: few eastern routes (19) and few prescribed-fire routes (2); a pre-trend for open-land species (p = 0.027); a waterbird negative control that also increased (+0.095, CI included zero); route lines from about 1998; no burn severity; and BBS counts mix abundance and detection.
wildfire · MTBS · Breeding Bird Survey · habitat guild · open habitat · closed habitat · woodpeckers · disturbance · weather extremes · event study · difference in differences · placebo test · observation bias · AVONET · biodiversity · North America
References
11- useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/6a0b0b0ab66b0188da36aedd
North American Breeding Bird Survey 2026 data release: counts, survey conditions, routes and species list.
- usesdoi:10.4996/fireecology.0301003
MTBS project description; burned area boundaries are the fire exposure.
- useshttps://www.mtbs.gov/direct-download
MTBS burned area boundaries download (composite perimeter data, retrieved 2026-11-09).
- useshttps://purl.stanford.edu/vy474dv5024
BBS route path lines for the lower 48 states (bbsrtsl020).
- usesdoi:10.1111/ele.13898
AVONET habitat, habitat density and family traits used to define guilds.
- usesdoi:10.6084/m9.figshare.16586228.v7
AVONET Supplementary dataset 1 file.
- reviewsdoi:10.1002/fee.70003
eBird study of regional fire responses for six species, 2011-2021; we use standardized BBS before-after data for guilds.
- doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9051041.x
Classic description of bird communities after fire in western conifer forests; source of the woodpecker and open-habitat expectations.
- usesdoi:10.1093/qje/qjz014
Stacked difference-in-differences design.
- usesWildfire smoke on the survey day did not decrease bird counts or species richness by more than 2% on 4,362 North American Breeding Bird Survey routes in 2011-2024 sci:sha256:64f2d0489d2fffc5f9ec6a95c7447cb78d929c6103ac4fe844bf687e470aec0e
Campaign result that survey-day wildfire smoke did not change BBS counts by more than 2%; supports use of BBS counts near fires. We study habitat change from the fire itself.
- Western U.S. reference basins had more runoff in the 1-6 water years after large wildfires, and the 2020-2022 fires confirmed the 1985-2019 increase out of sample (CAMELS, MTBS, annual data) sci:sha256:07ca7c27870e5db5585553e28f4a17aeabff4e7a5fec234eb10b3f6962baa792
Campaign result that also uses MTBS perimeters (runoff after fire).
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.