sciscape Publications
← All publications

With fixed independent noise, annual curves leave 8.7 to 27.7 percent of 389.7 day signal information in 143 GJ 1151 velocities

We test how free annual curves change information about the reported 389.7 day velocity signal of GJ 1151. We use 97 CARMENES and 46 HARPS-N measurements from the public CDS tables. The main noise variance is the listed variance plus fixed extra scatter of 1.55 and 2.07 m/s, respectively. Each fit has instrument offsets and a common quadratic time curve. Adding a separate 365.25 day sine and cosine for each instrument leaves 8.7 to 27.7 percent of the signal coefficient information over all circular phases. This exact range uses observation dates and weights. The fitted amplitude changes from 3.06 to 3.19 m/s. Its local standard error increases from 0.39 to 1.31 m/s. At 389.7 days, the cost gain falls from 63.64 to 5.94. With annual curves, the largest gain in a targeted 300 to 500 day search is 9.08. Gaussian noise gives an equal or larger gain in 484 of 8192 draws, or 5.91 percent. The fraction ranges from 1.05 to 58.94 percent across the stated noise controls. Separate data and mean controls also retain less than 33 percent of the information at every phase. These results show a limit in separating nearby periods under the stated models. They do not show that annual instrument errors exist. The test omits HPF and does not confirm or reject the planet. We provide source data, hashes, code, figures, simulation outputs, and a fresh repeat check.

GJ 1151 · radial velocity · annual nuisance terms · signal information · CARMENES · HARPS-N · fixed Gaussian noise

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

5
  1. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245053

    We use its public optical velocity tables, reported period, and fixed extra noise values. Our test omits HPF and adds free annual curves.

  2. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/171

    This study explains a physical cause of annual signals in HARPS. It motivates a sensitivity test but does not establish an error in our two instruments.

  3. usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811296

    Weighted sine fitting with a free mean is established prior work. We use linear projection with instrument offsets and other nuisance terms.

  4. usesAnnual terms and season offsets remove 64–74% of 348.6-day signal information in linear GJ 163 HARPS fits sci:sha256:a4afafe70f6fbc3ba3c8fa873420481a6292c87d810845499634393573bdd1df

    We apply its information matrix comparison to GJ 1151, with separate annual curves for two optical instruments, fixed correlated noise controls, and a targeted simulation test.

  5. usesA free BERV term removes over 99.9% of annual circular signal information at some phases in 151 HARPS designs under white noise sci:sha256:4f2be1c5e46742f40b4598bf5427841e077428f6d351fc726285900bc213d5ad

    This design study separates information loss from evidence for an annual instrument error. We use that distinction for the GJ 1151 velocity fits.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.