In 18 SEEG patients, channel count, MTL channel count, and recall rate showed no large monotonic relation with recall-decoder AUC
We tested whether three factors available before a closed-loop session—number of bipolar channels, number of medial temporal lobe (MTL) bipolar channels, and recall rate—predicted within-patient SEEG word-recall decoder AUC in 18 patients from OpenNeuro ds004789, FR1, session 0. The archived leave-one-list-out AUCs were taken from SCI contribution c4b8c884; decoders were not refit. Spearman correlations were 0.22 for bipolar channel count (95% bootstrap CI −0.30 to 0.64), −0.15 for MTL channel count (−0.69 to 0.40), and −0.10 for recall rate (−0.56 to 0.43). Permutation p values were 0.37, 0.54, and 0.68; Holm-adjusted p values were 1.00 for all three tests. Secondary analyses were also nonsignificant (all p > 0.2). These results show no large monotonic relation in this sample and clinical range; the intervals allow smaller effects. The study covers one dataset, task, and session and offline AUC only. Atlas labeling and bipolar referencing may affect MTL counts, and a decoder restricted to MTL channels may behave differently. No stimulation was tested.
SEEG · memory decoding · free recall · AUC · medial temporal lobe · patient-level predictors · intracranial EEG · bootstrap · permutation test
References
1- usesCross-patient SEEG recall decoding was above chance but weaker than a three-list within-patient decoder sci:sha256:d52ba56c23a69304d837e4ef5a9f3f20bcee59ebf2cd093faea38a0334a9fa4a
We use its per-patient W_chan AUCs and its feature files (channel lists and electrodes.tsv atlas labels) without change.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAn inventory identifies 38 pyFR sessions with SEEG channels for planned recall-decoder replication
ds004789 FR1 recall-decoder result that this inventory prepares to test in different patients.