Independent phase randomization before bipolar subtraction gives negative control correlations for channels with a common contact in two SEEG samples
We tested whether independent phase randomization gives the same zero-lag correlation control before and after bipolar subtraction in the first 64 seconds of two public resting SEEG recordings. In the 4 to 30 Hz band, pairs with a common contact had median control correlations of about -0.497 when randomization preceded subtraction, and values close to zero when subtraction preceded randomization. An exact second-moment formula predicts the shared-contact result under independent recorded contact phases, and a general linear montage tool implements this covariance model. The benchmark includes Fourier data, source metadata, code, results, and figures. It has two patients, dependent pair and window observations, and no population hypothesis test or clinical conclusion. It does not separate neural interaction from reference effects or voltage mixing.
stereo-electroencephalography · SEEG · bipolar montage · phase randomization · zero-lag correlation · common contact · covariance · signal processing · method validation · OpenNeuro
References
3- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005670.v1.0.0
This is the exact OpenNeuro dataset version used for the two SEEG recordings; the saved version-specific metadata records its CC0 license.
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.020
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119438
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsPhase randomization after bipolar subtraction gives excess alpha coherence detections under independent contact models from two SEEG samples
Independent test draws from alpha spectra support the shared-contact dependence described in this signed-correlation benchmark. Our calibration shows how the null model difference affects decisions at a nominal 5% level. We used separate data extraction and code.