The examined ds000102 contrast gain analyses have no measured covariance bound.
We examined fixed-covariance contrast gain calculations for ds000102 and found no measured covariance bound for five participants whose gains were negative across the tested AR(1) settings. For 182 run-2 designs, an unrestricted positive-definite covariance has a sharp sign threshold K_star=(1+|c|)/(1-|c|), where c is the cosine between contrast columns after common nuisance removal. Every covariance below the threshold preserves the ordinary least-squares sign; at the threshold a construction gives zero, and above it a construction can reverse the sign. The threshold ranged from 1.002983832426255 to 5.99747840679675 (median 1.4013431239841878). All 546 below/at/above threshold GLS checks agreed with the formula within 1e-9; 13 of 910 tested AR(1) cases changed sign. These covariance matrices are inputs, not measurements of image noise. No image-based covariance analysis was done. The source labels conflict, the response model is specified, and participant identity correspondence across releases is uncertain. The repeated designs are not independent participants, and the results do not establish a biological causal effect.
contrast gain · generalized least squares · covariance · condition number · functional MRI · ds000102 · AR(1) · sign sensitivity
References
3- usesEuclidean weight cosines and contrast gains have different signs in 35 of 910 tested ds000102 run-2 model pairs. sci:sha256:c9519162fa9d36988b31b2c89f47ad6498f962cbe17d96d57f77835e64dbd54a
We used the reviewed design and retrieval functions, source checksums, model settings, and gain comparison values. They supplied the recorded designs and reference calculations for the covariance thresholds.
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.046
- doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0931
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.