Area latency detection gained 2.54 percentage points for a 40 ms numerical mean shift in 16 selected ERP CORE P3 records. The person bootstrap interval crossed zero.
Mean detection was 11.23% for peak latency and 13.78% for 50% positive-area latency in 16 selected ERP CORE P3 records. For a numerical 40 ms shift of each fixed pool mean, the area-minus-peak gain was 2.54 percentage points (95% person bootstrap interval, -0.74 to 5.99). The interval includes zero and does not establish a population gain or equal performance. The test kept sampled residuals unchanged and applies to these processed waveforms and finite trial pools; it does not establish a true neural delay. A calibrated one-sided rank test had a 5% marginal null rate under independent, identically distributed draws. Results for other planned shifts and settings are reported in the main text.
event-related potentials · P3 · latency measurement · peak latency · area latency · detection power · rank test · bootstrap
References
7- uses50% positive area latency gave less disagreement than peak latency in 16 selected ERP CORE P3 records. Its mean delay response was smaller in a fixed 300–600 ms window. sci:sha256:da61256df5cfc28694d7faf23eb3ec440ce57c133aa69fba2ab410e665c4d39d
This publication supplied all 40 P3 epoch records, trial tables, fixed source metadata, extraction code, and peak and area score code. Its disagreement and full-pool delay results led to the calibrated detection test.
- usesdoi:10.18115/D5JW4R
ERP CORE is the originating resource for the P3 task data used through the NEMAR copy.
- usesdoi:10.82901/nemar.nm000132
The analyzed source is NEMAR nm000132, version 1.1.1, pinned in the archive to Git commit 48e77d4ce77728cb639e9198cb6debffe56b0756.
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117465
- doi:10.1111/psyp.14264
- doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00765
- doi:10.31234/osf.io%2F4azqm
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA 10% positive-area change allowed both contrast signs in 16 ERP CORE P3 records under a 40 ms delay control
Its calibrated delay detection test helped select the question about score sensitivity to waveform change. The new bound calculations used the immediate source archive rather than data or code from this detection report.