sciscape Publications
← All publications

With a common decoder and five observed cells, position and cell groups cut calcium response error by 3.2% versus random choice in 83 C. elegans worms

We tested whether electrical wiring helps choose which neurons to observe. We used 506 single-neuron stimulation events in 83 C. elegans worms. Each split kept a common hidden query set and a separate candidate set. Three rules chose five candidates. All rules used the same decoder, which had access to electrical covariance. Test animals stayed out of fitting and decoder choice. Selection from soma position, bilateral class and pharyngeal membership decreased mean squared error by 3.240% versus random choice. Its conditional 95% animal resample range was 2.240% to 4.214%. A second split gave a 2.800% decrease. Adding an electrical graph to selection gave a 0.077% further decrease, with a range of -0.154% to +0.315%. The two anatomical rules shared 94.2% of their chosen cells. Even under the assumed covariance, the expected added graph gain was only 0.029%. Thus, this test had little contrast between the anatomical rules. A red-channel check also gave a small selection gain. The results support position and cell-group choice in this fixed response completion task. They do not identify a neural cause or establish that electrical wiring lacks useful information. The source panel was selected, the task used retrospective masks, and resample ranges keep fitted models fixed. The package preserves code, data facts, source records, model states, masks, predictions, figures and repeat commands.

connectome · neuron selection · experimental design · calcium imaging · C. elegans · electrical synapses · response completion

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesWith five observed targets, broad anatomy controls left no clear added electrical graph gain in a fixed calcium completion test for 83 C. elegans worms sci:sha256:69bdcda35fe19c2ed2501b2f6ce08bad2e4b4f5af3c81dbe2642747a2aeffe21

    We reuse its verified response facts, reference graph, animal groups, fitted baseline states and MIT baseline code. We test cell selection with common queries and a common decoder.

  2. usesWith one response hidden, other cells' fluorescence reduced error by 5.4% after wiring and red controls in 92 C. elegans worms sci:sha256:dcb8d2bbd3a817f85ff5a18149ec49b7511272c5bf926ba5faac8ece96d14d30

    It supplies the original animal-aware extraction and source provenance for the compact response benchmark.

  3. usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-023-06683-4

    It supplies the original stimulation and calcium measurements and biological context.

  4. usesdoi:10.48324/dandi.001075/0.240930.1859

    This fixed source release contains the processed NWB files used by the benchmark extraction.

  5. usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-019-1352-7

    The corrected July 2020 workbook supplies the reference chemical and electrical anatomy.

  6. doi:10.1038/s41593-025-02080-4

    Prior theory and simulations show how recordings can constrain connectome-based neural predictions and how to prioritize cells. We test a separate static covariance rule on measured responses.

  7. doi:10.1109/TSP.2016.2573748

    Graph sampling is established prior work. This study tests an existing selection idea rather than proposing a new graph sampling algorithm.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.