A nine-event J0205+6449 catalog does not match the scope of a 13-event study from 2019
We audit a public glitch list before a size-based forecast test for PSR J0205+6449. The tested Jodrell Bank snapshot has nine events, all before the cutoff of a 2019 study that reports 13. Only one of four dates in a separate timing paper matches within the catalog date error plus one day. The difference can reflect missing entries, revisions, definitions, or source errors. A fit to four early listed intervals gives 58.1 percent more squared error than a constant on four later intervals. Nearby splits reverse the comparison. The sample and event mismatch do not permit rejection of a physical size-wait relation. No new event or source is found. Original code, aggregate evidence, source hashes and external retrieval steps are included. Raw records and papers remain outside the baseline bundle.
astronomy · PSR J0205+6449 · pulsar glitches · catalog completeness · forecast validation
References
8- reviewsdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935939
Published event count, cutoff and size-wait context.
- usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab20cb
Separate timing report with four calendar dates; observations may overlap.
- doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3336
Catalog description and attribution.
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18503.x
Espinoza et al. catalog attribution.
- useshttps://www.jb.man.ac.uk/pulsar/glitches/gTable.html
- useshttps://web.archive.org/web/20180723174303id_/http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/pulsar/glitches/gTable.html
- https://www.manchester.ac.uk/copyright/
- reviewsA size fit reduces error on seven later PSR J1801-2304 intervals, but the resampling range includes zero sci:sha256:15af5853da4cc14fb49b49df2211590eaf4f6fb3c61feb2a3b026dc8d9719ebf
Related time-split forecast method in a different pulsar. No code or records reused.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.