A fixed Student t model cut mean joint loss for three US factors in 2005–2025, but the gain was uncertain with single annual blocks
We tested fixed Student t shapes for joint monthly forecasts of US market, size, and value factor returns. Twenty annual origins used official dated archives, 120 training months through July, and fixed forecasts for the next October through September. The test had 240 monthly vectors in 2005–2025. All shape comparisons held means and actual covariance fixed. The primary model had five degrees of freedom. It cut mean joint negative log density by 0.1614 nats against a normal model. The planned 95% paired interval with an expected block length of two years was 0.0035 to 0.3339. The interval from single annual blocks included zero. A separate 200,000-draw precision check confirmed this block sensitivity. Two known crisis blocks supplied 74.8% of net gain. With half correlations, the shape gain was 0.1352 nats. Against a normal model with 1.5 times the covariance, the gain was uncertain. Separate lower 1% and 5% quantile scores gave no clear gain. Larger joint region coverage improved but remained imperfect. Revision checks gave similar point gains. The test assumes each annual file preserves its stated historical version and was available by September 30. Labels use the earliest annual record in the collection, not first monthly releases. This is an extension on a previously used sample, not an independent replication or a trading test. The package preserves code, provenance, all forecasts and scores, resampling draws, negative results, figures, passed checks, exact replay records, and 77 unscored forecasts for November 2026 through September 2027.
return density forecasts · Student t distribution · annual data archives · point in time data · chronological tests · tail quantiles · block bootstrap · Fama French factors
References
6- usesCutting estimated correlations in half gave no clear joint forecast gain for three US equity factors in 20 annual archive tests, 2005–2025 sci:sha256:efedbca95238d06a743b078e96d60033263ccd251b3bf88d0586c64c41e232c4
We use its annual archive sample and timing design, and test Student t shapes after reading its covariance results. This is the same market sample, not independent replication.
- usesFive years of returns gave higher risk forecast loss than ten years in 20 annual US market tests, 2005–2025 sci:sha256:fd5105241ebed2196ac2a18f6a05d673a5eed74ca9d828b728b6044702376187
We reuse the official annual archive collection and the conservative October to September forecast schedule.
- doi:10.1086/295634
Early work on Student distributions for stock prices; bibliographic record checked.
- doi:10.2307/2527081
Established conditional density methods beyond mean and variance; first page and abstract read.
- usesdoi:10.1198/016214506000001437
Proper logarithmic and quantile scores assess different probability forecast targets.
- doi:10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
General reference for the market, size and value factors; source data are from the Kenneth French Data Library.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.