sciscape Publications
← All publications

Variance and autocorrelation trends did not improve 5-year forecasts of local disappearance beyond abundance and trend in BBS and BioTIME 2.0 count series

Question: do generic early-warning signals (EWS) of critical slowing down occur before local disappearances in wild populations, and do they improve a forecast that already uses abundance and trend? Data: North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) 1966-2023 (standard runs) and BioTIME 2.0 without its BBS subset. Method: a forecast origin is a species at a site with a 15-year window of consecutive annual counts, presence at the origin year and occupancy of at least 80%. The outcome is zero counts in the next 5 sampled years. Five EWS are Kendall trends of the rolling SD, CV and lag-1 autocorrelation on counts and log counts. We calculated within-group AUCs (BBS state or province; BioTIME study) with cluster-bootstrap CIs. We compared cross-validated logistic models with and without the EWS, and we calculated the same EWS on no-CSD surrogates (log-linear trend plus negative-binomial count noise). Results: BBS had 480,362 origins and 1,065 disappearances; BioTIME had 71,410 origins and 421 disappearances in 92 studies. Adding the EWS changed the AUC by -0.0002 (95% CI -0.0009 to 0.0004) in BBS (baseline 0.919) and by -0.0022 (-0.0076 to 0.0010) in BioTIME (baseline 0.781). In 17 analyses that changed the window, horizon, occupancy rule, surrogate trend and observer subset, the change was between -0.0053 and +0.0014. Autocorrelation trends had AUCs of 0.48-0.52, equal to the null. The CV trend predicted disappearance (BBS AUC 0.621), but the surrogates gave 0.601. In BBS routes with the same observer throughout, the excess above the null was gone at W = 15 (0.604 against 0.600). With a 20-year window, a variance excess of about 0.05 AUC remained. Low recent abundance alone gave AUC 0.908 (BBS). Limitations: the outcome includes detection zeros, the windows are short, most disappearances are probably not bifurcation-driven, and the surrogate does not model process noise.

early warning signals · critical slowing down · local extinction · Breeding Bird Survey · BioTIME · population collapse · forecasting · observer effects · surrogate null model · monitoring data

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

12
  1. usesdoi:10.5066/P136CRBV

    BBS 2024 release (1966-2023) route counts and observer IDs are the main data.

  2. usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.15222193

    BioTIME 2.0 time series give the cross-taxon replication.

  3. doi:10.1111/geb.70003

    BioTIME 2.0 data paper.

  4. doi:10.1038/nature08227

    Theory of generic early-warning signals for critical transitions.

  5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041010

    Rolling-window indicator and Kendall tau methods that we follow.

  6. doi:10.1038/nature09389

    Laboratory evidence of early-warning signals before extinction.

  7. doi:10.1086/681573

    Factors that reduce EWS detectability in population collapse.

  8. doi:10.1038/ncomms10984

    Abundance-based and trait-based EWS for population collapse.

  9. supportsdoi:10.1111/1365-2664.12519

    Found inconsistent EWS performance in long-term field data; our result agrees.

  10. supportsdoi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0125

    Showed that EWS need a null reference; our surrogate test applies this to field counts.

  11. doi:10.2307/4088860

    Observer effects in the BBS, which explain part of the variance signal.

  12. Observer terms change the bird community temperature trend tenfold on 1,859 North American BBS routes (1970–2024), and within-observer declines are larger for high-pitched species sci:sha256:7895a5193624b2e131a63cb83531022a3859b2aa20011aea787f85ff0cc8a8f0

    Related SCI result on BBS observer effects on community change.

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.