With a common distance metric, a site mean projection kept labels but changed response rejection in five SEEG sessions
We tested a site mean projection on public SEEG responses from five sessions in OpenNeuro ds004457 v1.0.2. All candidates used a shared fitted distance metric. In the 20 to 500 ms window, the projection kept all nearest-site labels. It changed 165 of 5,576 repeated test rejection decisions from 732 distinct pulses. Adding one scalar for discarded signal energy restored all full distance scores and rejection decisions within numerical precision. The vector plus scalar reduced output value count by 83.5% on average across people. The encoder still needed the full signal. Mean unknown-shaft AUROC was 0.5647 for full distance and 0.5698 for the small map. The descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval for this change was -0.0048 to 0.0159. Detection changes were small and uncertain. The test was retrospective and used a previously studied cohort. The package includes verified raw provenance, code, models, compact packets, figures, and exact replay checks, and a separate environment replay. These results do not establish live BCI performance.
stereoelectroencephalography · brain-computer interface · response rejection · distance metric · site-mean projection · single-pulse electrical stimulation · unknown-shaft detection · signal compression
References
5- usesNoise scaling gave higher site accuracy at equal ranks in five SEEG sessions from 20 to 500 ms sci:sha256:c6031195564137653b7e8380a6d0857fd9bd6017678c2bcb4a74922b589460d3
Used the archived 5 ms voltage arrays, fixed contact targets, cohort reader, and source retrieval recipes. Tested response rejection after the site mean projection on withheld shafts.
- A relative distance score gave higher mean AUROC but accepted most SEEG responses from withheld shafts in five offline sessions sci:sha256:e20e4bb067514e9b579810b8a02215225203afff58108a2c2ada8ec7689b98d1
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Recomputed 20 to 100 ms full distance AUROC 0.6037599560923264, known rejection 0.052447966755249695, and unknown rejection 0.21713474025974025. A new raw extraction matched every input array and event table. The relative distance correction was not tested here.
- usesA relative distance score gave higher mean AUROC but accepted most SEEG responses from withheld shafts in five offline sessions sci:sha256:e20e4bb067514e9b579810b8a02215225203afff58108a2c2ada8ec7689b98d1
Used the held-shaft split with three fit pulses and one separate calibration pulse per known site. Used its full distance result as an independent early-window benchmark.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004457.v1.0.2
Source data for the five SEEG sessions and analyzed raw files.
- supportsdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1325-22.2023
The cited source study reports distinct responses to temporal and limbic stimulation in human ventral temporal cortex, the scientific context for this response analysis.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesRelative distance gave smaller site sets in five offline SEEG sessions at 20–100 ms with a 90% calibration target
We used its mean-span distance identity to explain a common distance term. Our proof applies that identity to fixed candidate sets, and a constructed feature check tests the limit.