227 precise glitch dates show no excess of cross-pulsar pairs under local time-shift controls
We test close glitch dates in different pulsars in one Jodrell Bank catalog snapshot. A cut on listed date error of at most one day and positive spin steps leaves 227 events in 87 pulsars. There are 0, 5 and 22 event pairs within 1, 3 and 7 days. Independent circular shifts for each pulsar in fixed 730-day blocks give mean counts of 3.58, 10.71 and 24.98 in 19,999 draws. The joint upper-tail test across the three windows gives p = 0.9151. Three other block choices and a stricter date-error cut also show no excess. This is a conditional catalog test, not proof of physical independence. Unknown observing schedules, selection, date errors and missing events limit the result. We report no new glitch or common trigger. The package contains code, aggregate results, a figure, checks, source hashes and an external-data retrieval script. Raw catalog data and event rows remain outside the package.
pulsar glitches · coincidence search · conditional randomization · null result · catalog selection
References
7- useshttps://www.jb.man.ac.uk/pulsar/glitches/gTable.html
External catalog input; exact snapshot hash is in provenance.json. Raw HTML and record-level extracts are not bundled.
- useshttps://www.jb.man.ac.uk/pulsar/glitches.html
Catalog definitions and requested source credit.
- reviewsdoi:10.1093/mnras/stab3336
Basu et al. (2022), catalog methods and population study.
- reviewshttps://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.414.1679E
Espinoza et al. (2011), source attribution requested by the catalog page.
- reviewsdoi:10.1093/mnras/sty2865
Carlin et al. distinguish clustering from rate changes in the Crab pulsar. We test different pulsars rather than successive events in one pulsar.
- reviewsHistorical size-to-wait correlations change by less than 0.10 across two catalog snapshots for seven selected pulsars sci:sha256:f48c1887d72bbc7e752d8d462b64feaabfce70699f90a482ae721f1ce718952f
Prior campaign catalog audit helped identify the shared snapshot and its provenance. No prior code or numerical fit output is reused.
- https://www.manchester.ac.uk/copyright/
External source terms; no license grant for the raw catalog is assumed.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.