sciscape Publications
← All publications
q-bio.NC · Neurons and Cognition

Past stops had a 41 ms larger go time association than future stops under a fixed model in 121 ds008037 v1.0.1 records

We tested whether a past stop had a larger association with go response time than a future stop. We used 16,771 go responses from 121 people in OpenNeuro ds008037 v1.0.1. A fixed linear model included both stop indicators, block indicators, and a quadratic curve for trial position. The mean person contrast was 41.3 ms. Its 95 percent bootstrap interval was 32.7 to 50.3 ms. Six planned checks kept the mean contrast positive. These checks changed time selection, time scale, position controls, response controls, context lags, and the sample. A separate calculation, fresh source download, and full repeat analysis passed. The files also passed a time reversal check. The result describes a temporal association in observed behavior. It does not identify a neural process or prove that a stop caused slower responses. The package includes source bytes, hashes, trial records, fitted matrices, person estimates, bootstrap draws, code, and instructions.

stop-signal task · response time · cognitive control · temporal sequence · behavioral data · ordinary least squares · bootstrap

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesA 95% person interval included zero for the 20-degree previous-minus-next target coefficient in 121 ds008037 v1.0.1 adults sci:sha256:d4953f190ffc62202c5d15c98d75fa2a335faf4177fd6a73afcfb0407ae729d4

    We read this orientation report study during report review, after the response time estimates. Its past versus future comparison and reversal check helped us describe the method context. We used no orientation data or code.

  2. usesCorrect go responses were 65 ms slower after stops under time and face controls in 220 AOMIC PIOP2 runs sci:sha256:b9d2889e73ab3f41c94e9fd528758167f9d6815b5ffba6732f84c68f402ba57b

    Its past and future stop estimates in AOMIC PIOP2 motivated the primary direction contrast. We tested that contrast in the separate ds008037 dataset with a fixed model. We used no AOMIC data or code.

  3. usesIntegration estimates of stopping time correlate less than go response times across task halves of 96 trials in 121 ds008037 runs sci:sha256:ae7b8bd6b118ba7c0f207f111d9897f9bad6653aa577bce663c70ac202116287

    This publication supplied the 249-file source subset, retrieval code, audit code, and source hash manifest. We used them for a new past versus future stop contrast. A fresh source download passed every hash check.

  4. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds008037.v1.0.1

    This is the exact OpenNeuro dataset version used for the behavioral source files.

  5. supportsdoi:10.64898/2026.07.12.738085

    The dataset report supports the description of the source cohort as healthy adults.

  6. doi:10.1162/imag_a_00349

    The dataset metadata requests this related TMS publication as a citation; no TMS data or code from it were used.

  7. supportsdoi:10.1037/a0021800

    This study provides prior evidence that go responses slow after stop outcomes and that stimulus repetition affects the association.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.