At fixed periods, HD 20794 circular-pair trials give tail rates of 0.9% for white noise and 17.9% for 30-day noise
We test two explanations for the public HD 20794 velocities: one eccentric orbit, or two circular orbits. The outer period is fixed at 647.6 days. The circular pair has a second period of 323.8 days. We use 811 night means and three fixed Gaussian noise matrices. Each model has 11 nominal mean parameters. We generate 1,000 trials from each fitted model mean and fit both complete model families again. Two nearby circular-pair means provide additional tests in each noise setting. For independent noise, the observed fit advantage is matched or exceeded by 9 of 1,000 circular-pair trials. The rate is 0.9 percent, with a 95 percent Monte Carlo interval of 0.41 to 1.70 percent. The 30-day setting uses a 0.5 m/s exponential noise term and the same total marginal variance. Its rate is 179 of 1,000 trials, or 17.9 percent (15.57 to 20.42 percent). A 300-day control gives 0.6 percent (0.22 to 1.30 percent). Its circular-pair fit also has a poor absolute chi-square upper tail of 0.00127. Both correlated settings place the observed eccentricity at the imposed ceiling of 0.8. The relative preference therefore depends on the tested noise assumption. These are local trial rates at fitted means. They are not uniform p values for all circular-pair parameters or planet probabilities. No new planet is detected. The package contains source tables, provenance, code, all 12,000 trials, figures, and numerical checks.
HD 20794 · radial velocity · eccentricity · circular orbit pair · parametric simulation · correlated noise · model comparison · reproducible astronomy
References
11- A 647.6-day eccentric curve fits 811 HD 20794 nights better than a fixed 2:1 circular pair under a 1 m/s noise term sci:sha256:c409aa928d17822b918d8d0c69baf99de3f193127237bc0490155837d246d0c2
[Legacy relation: reproduces] We reproduce its observed comparison of the same two fixed-period models and three noise matrices. We add repeated complete model fits to simulated data.
- usesA Gaia motion correction reduces the difference between two public HD 20794 velocity tables on 64 nights in 2019–2023 sci:sha256:6039fff418f96a889c4a9ed1fc8c320f137bf96e956099d423f22839f0ff73c5
We use its Gaia-based numerical perspective correction for the public ESPRESSO sBART velocities.
- An eccentric 647.6-day model lowers mean squared error in 9 of 18 omitted HD 20794 seasons in a fit with fixed periods and independent Gaussian noise sci:sha256:33d2a5aaa63141db39d6bccc13412d17b7337d9dca639abce667e5bdc293104c
It tests fits with omitted observing seasons. Our simulation test compares a different alternative: two circular curves at an exact period ratio of two.
- usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451769
It supplies the public velocity products, the reported signals, and the adopted fixed periods.
- usesdoi:10.26093/cds/vizier.36930297
We download and preserve four source tables from this catalogue. Three enter the analysis.
- doi:10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/168
It establishes the known ambiguity between an eccentric orbit and two circular orbits.
- doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1849
It studies noise, eccentricity bias, and the comparison with two circular planets.
- doi:10.1093/mnras/stz236
It uses realistic observation times to simulate the ambiguity between one eccentric orbit and two circular orbits.
- doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556609
It already gives Bayesian comparisons for HD 20794. Our local fixed-period trial rates answer a different question.
- usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940
The adopted correction uses numerical Gaia DR3 astrometry through the cited SCI correction audit. The raw Gaia response is not bundled.
- doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.07514
It studies short-time ESPRESSO velocity noise in HD 20794. It supports the need to state noise assumptions but does not validate our exponential noise models.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.