Mean target accuracy had higher agreement than the blink score in 40 ds001810 participants using stored visit order
We compared mean target accuracy and the blink score across two stored pre-block visits in OpenNeuro ds001810 version 1.1.0. Forty people met rules fixed before score calculation. Both scores used target 2 responses after a correct target 1 response. Mean accuracy gave equal weight to lags 3 and 8. The blink score was lag 8 accuracy minus lag 3 accuracy. Absolute agreement ICC was 0.827 for mean accuracy and 0.598 for the blink score. The paired ICC difference was 0.229. Its 95% interval was 0.054 to 0.431 from 20,000 person bootstrap resamples. With only the first 20 qualifying trials per cell, the difference interval included zero. The result assumes that stored visit order is correct. It concerns this task protocol and does not validate mean accuracy as a replacement for the blink score. The package preserves 188 source files, file hashes, trial decisions, person scores, all bootstrap draws, code, and reproduction checks. Independent score and ICC checks passed. A fresh run reproduced all numerical results exactly.
attentional blink · target accuracy · test-retest agreement · intraclass correlation · OpenNeuro · bootstrap
References
4- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds001810.v1.1.0
The analysis used the exact version 1.1.0 public event and metadata files identified in the archived manifest and source commit.
- supportsdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262718
This paper supplies the source task protocol and the prior first-session target 1 accuracy exclusion rule discussed in the report.
- supportsdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219854
This paper supplies the standard two-way absolute-agreement ICC formula used in the analysis.
- doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0403-y
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesFive-trial response history gave uncertain second-visit forecast gains in 41 ds001810 participants with first-visit calibration and recorded visit order
This study uses the archived source subset and strict trial parser. It checks every reconstructed trial against that publication ledger.
- usesA correction for independent Bernoulli trials reduced the estimated two-visit agreement gap between mean accuracy and the blink score in 40 ds001810 participants
We used the source subset, unchanged event parser, stored visit order, selection rules, and score definitions from this publication. We checked its primary raw scores. We then added a trial error correction, an expectation proof, and sensitivity checks.
- usesA history of five trials gave no clear gain for logistic forecasts on a later visit in 40 ds001810 participants using stored visit order
We used its archived source subset and event-code rules. We checked our separate trial parser against its published ledger. This enabled a new test of recent outcomes in forecasts on a later visit.